Solving the Equation: Sin(2T) = (625/4) x sin(40)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ally79
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation Sin(2T) = (625/4) x sin(40) cannot be solved for T because the maximum value of the sine function is 1, making Sin(2T) equal to 100.4 impossible. The calculation of (625/4) x sin(40) yields a value outside the valid range for sine, indicating an error in the equation or the parameters used. It is suggested that the angle "40" might be in a different unit, such as millidegrees, which could bring the result within the acceptable range. Additionally, if the coefficient were closer to 6.25 instead of 625, a solution might exist. Ultimately, there is no valid T that satisfies the given equation as stated.
ally79
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This equation is killing me, Sin(2T) = (625/4) x sin(40)

I have need to solve it for T where T is the angle. However I either end up getting an error or an angle that is less than 1 degree which i know is wrong.

Initially i tried doing the 625/4 x sin 40 which gave me 100.44

So i had Sin(2T) = 100.4

then tried to take the Sin of both sides but get an error on my calculator.

Please help me, it seems so simple to me but i just can't get my brain to work
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Maybe it does not have a solution. This other equation, sin(x)=2, doesn't have a solution either, since the range of the sin function is [-1,1].

The only possibility I see is that your angles are not in degrees (nor in radians either), but in some hypothetical and very small unit. For example, suppose "40" is not in degrees, but in 1000ths of a degree, in "millidegrees". Then (625/4) x sin(40 millidegrees) would be in the range [-1,1].

P.S.:
Is there a chance of some error in the "625" number? Because if it were close to 6.25 (6 point 25), (actually, if it were just a bit smaller than 6.25), then 6.25/4 x sin(40) would be very close to 1.
 
Last edited:
ally79 said:
This equation is killing me, Sin(2T) = (625/4) x sin(40)

I have need to solve it for T where T is the angle. However I either end up getting an error or an angle that is less than 1 degree which i know is wrong.

Initially i tried doing the 625/4 x sin 40 which gave me 100.44

So i had Sin(2T) = 100.4

then tried to take the Sin of both sides but get an error on my calculator.

Please help me, it seems so simple to me but i just can't get my brain to work
You mean, I presume, take the arcsine rather than Sin. Yes, you will get an error for that: for any number x, sin(x) is between -1 and 1. No matter what T is, sin(2T) must be between -1 and 1. There is NO T such that sin(2T) is equal to 100.4.

Where did you get "sin(2T)= 625/4 x sin(40)"?

(One possiblity, though I am reluctant to mention it, is that you are dealing with complex numbers. sin(2T)= (e2T- e-2T[/itex])/2 can be equal to 100.4 if T is an imaginary number. Surely that's not what you want?)
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top