Solving the Lie Bracket Question in Quantum Mechanics

Marin
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I was doing an assignment in quantum mechanics and came upon the following fact I cannot explain to me.

I hope someone of you can and will be willing to :)


Consider the creation and annihilation operators: a^+ and a and also the momentum and position operators p and x:

x=\frac{1}{\sqrt 2 c}(a+a^{\dagger})
p=\frac{\hbar c}{\sqrt 2 i}(a-a^{\dagger})
a=\frac{1}{\sqrt 2}(cx+\frac{i}{c\hbar}p)
a^{\dagger}=\frac{1}{\sqrt 2}(cx-\frac{i}{c\hbar}p)

c=\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{\hbar}}


and the canonical commucator relation: [x,p]=i\hbar 1, where 1 is the identity operator


It follows immediately from the canonical commutator relation between x and p that

[a,a^{\dagger}]=1}
Now, observe what happens when I take the adjoint of this equation:

([a,a^{\dagger}])^{\dagger}=(aa^{\dagger}-a^{\dagger}a)^{\dagger}=a^{\dagger}a-aa^{\dagger}=-[a,a^{\dagger}]=-1

which is peculiar since I thought that the Identity is hermitian: 1^{\dagger}=1, which apperantly doesn't hold here..

Can anyone tell me why this is so?

thanks in advance,

marin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I found your mistake here
Marin said:
([a,a^{\dagger}])^{\dagger}=(aa^{\dagger}-a^{\dagger}a)^{\dagger}=a^{\dagger}a-aa^{\dagger}=-[a,a^{\dagger}]=-1
marin

Hi Martin,

Using the fact that transposing the product of two operator swaps them and gives the product of their transposes

(A B)^\dagger = B^\dagger A^\dagger

we have,

([a,a^{\dagger}])^{\dagger}=(aa^{\dagger}-a^{\dagger}a)^{\dagger}=a^{\dagger\dagger}a^\dagger - a^\dagger a^{\dagger\dagger} = a a^\dagger - a^\dagger a = 1
 
Last edited:
yes, of course!

sorry for asking...

and thanks once again!
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top