Solving the Schrodinger Equation for 1D Electron Motion

irony of truth
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
I am trying to find the Schrodinger's equation for the one-dimensional motion of an electron, not acted upon by any forces.

So.. should I begin using the time independent form of the Schrodinger's equation? What should I arrive at? Should I let my V(x) = 0?

Also, how do I show that the total energy of that particular schrodinger's equation is not quantized?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the general form of the SE's equation...?What's the free particle's Hamiltonian...?

Daniel.
 
irony of truth said:
So.. should I begin using the time independent form of the Schrodinger's equation?

Yes.

Should I let my V(x) = 0?

Yes.

Also, how do I show that the total energy of that particular schrodinger's equation is not quantized?

Find the general solution of your Schrödinger equation, and show that any value of E leads to an acceptable solution for your boundary conditions. Of course, you don't really have any boundary conditions, which simplifies matters! (unlike the infinite square well a.k.a. "particle in a box" where the boundary conditions restrict the acceptable values of E to a discrete set)
 
Thank you for your helps... I can manage from here... E = (hbar)k^2 / (2m) >= 0
 
That's right.And the "k" wan take any real value...Making the energy spectrum the real positive semiaxis.

Daniel.
 
jtbell said:
Of course, you don't really have any boundary conditions
You do have boundary conditions, you have to require that your solution goes to zero at infinity, otherwise your solution is not normalizable.
For a free particle, that actually represents a big problem, since the free particle wavefunction (e^{ipx/\hbar) isn't nomalizable!
That's the reason one should really work with wavepackets in the cases where V(x) = 0, those are normalizable.
Almost any textbook in quantum mechanics has a discussion on that particular topic.
 
Last edited:
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top