Solving Third Order ODE: Proving Single Solution?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter scotlass
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a third order ordinary differential equation (ODE) of the form y''' + A/y = 0, where y = y(x) and A is a constant. Participants explore the existence and uniqueness of solutions under specific boundary conditions, including numerical approaches and potential analytic forms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant believes there is no analytic solution to the ODE but can find a numerical solution under certain conditions.
  • Another participant challenges the claim of no analytic solution, suggesting that solutions exist as long as boundary conditions do not require y = 0.
  • A participant emphasizes the importance of boundary conditions in determining the uniqueness of solutions, providing examples of different boundary conditions leading to unique, no, or infinite solutions.
  • Further details about the specific boundary conditions are provided, including y(-1) = 0, y(1) = 0, and additional conditions on the first derivative and an integral constraint.
  • One participant proposes a transformation of the original equation into a form that resembles a standard Emden-Fowler equation, suggesting a potential pathway for further analysis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence of analytic solutions and the implications of the boundary conditions. There is no consensus on whether the numerical solution found is the only real, non-negative solution.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of the problem, including the singular behavior of the third derivative at the boundary points and the implications of having more boundary conditions than unknowns.

scotlass
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello, this is my first post so I am not familiar with how to write maths in here.

I have a third order ode of the form

y'''+A/y=0 where y=y(x) (A is just a constant) with well defined boundary conditions.

I believe there is no analytic solution to an ode of this form, but I can (by imposing a further condition) solve this numerically for y.

My question is this; I solve this numerically in Maple and one answer pops out. Is there any way I can easily prove this is the only real, non-negative solution?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't think of any way to answer your question because I can't imagine why you would "I believe there is no analytic solution to an ode of this form". It seems to me pretty obvious that there exist a solution as long as the boundary conditions do not require y= 0. Perhaps you could explain a little more exactly what you mean.

You don't say WHAT boundary conditions you have. Whether or not a boundary value problem has a unique solution depends strongly on the boundary conditions themselves.

For example, the problem y"+ y= 0, with boundary conditions, y(0)= 0, y(1)= 0 has a unique solution. The same equation with boundary conditions y(0)= 0, [itex]y(\pi)= 1[/itex] has no solution. The same equation with boundary conditions y(0)= 0, [itex]y(\pi)= 0[/itex] has an infinite number of solutions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the reply,

my bcs are y(-1)=0, y(1)=0, y'(-1)=beta1, y'(1)=(beta1^2+4A)^(1/2) and y must also satisfy (integral y dx, x=-1..1)=2/3.

I have a third order ode, 2 unknowns and 5 conditions so I have enough for a solution.

This does mean y''' is singular at x=-1, 1 but that is ok.

As far as I can see this cannot be solved analytically, but I can find one numerical solution, can I know there are no other solutions that are everywhere real and positive?
 
Hm. All I can think of is that your equation may be derived from

[tex]y y^{\prime \prime} + A x + B - \frac{y^{\prime 2}}{2} = 0[/tex]

where B is a constant. But

[tex]y y^{\prime \prime} - \frac{y^{\prime 2}}{2} = 2 y^{\frac{3}{2}} (\sqrt{y})^{\prime \prime}[/tex]

Therefore you can re-write your equation

[tex]u^{\prime \prime} + \frac{Ax + B}{2 u^{ 3}} = 0[/tex]

with the substitution [tex]u = \sqrt{y}[/tex]

...and with a suitable sub for x, you should get a standard Emden-Fowler equation. See here. (EqWorld)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K