Solving Three Ball Collision: Elastic Collision with M and m Masses

  • Thread starter Thread starter momo1111
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Collision
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the elastic collision problem involving a ball of mass M colliding with two stationary balls of mass m. Participants express confusion over the notation and the number of equations available to solve for the unknown velocities after the collision. It is noted that there are four unknowns (vx, vy, v1, and v2) but only three equations, complicating the solution. Clarifications on the equations and conditions of elasticity are suggested to better approach the problem. The conversation emphasizes the need for precise notation and accurate problem formulation to find the velocity of mass M post-collision.
momo1111
Messages
12
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


?temp_hash=b5a5acd48f2cef2e42c7ddd45a48430f.jpg

Ball of mass M collide two balls of mass m , elastic collision .
initially, M has velocity v , and two balls are stationary.
after the collision the two masses move ,like in figure , v_a , v_b /
What is the velocity V ,of mass M after the collision ?


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


1231.png

try to manipulate the equations , with no success.
help
 

Attachments

  • תמונה ללא שם.jpg
    תמונה ללא שם.jpg
    7.6 KB · Views: 723
Physics news on Phys.org
Your notation is a bit confusing, but I think I get it.

Consider that you have four scalar unknowns (vx, vy, v1, and v2) but only three equations.
 
fix notation
upload_2015-7-11_20-27-5.png
 
Dr. Courtney said:
Consider that you have four scalar unknowns (vx, vy, v1, and v2) but only three equations.
The way I read it, vA, vB are given, so it's 3 equations and 2 unknowns. Still not good. Could choose to ignore the elasticity condition.

momo, are you sure you have quoted the question exactly?
I assume your last equation in post #3 should read v'2=v'x2+v'y2.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top