Solving using schrodinger equation techniques

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the 2D Schrödinger equation for a scalar field function E(x,y) under a tube potential defined by k(x,y). The equation involves a second-order differential operator and is influenced by the eigenvalue k1. The solutions can be approached using Bessel functions and require numerical methods, with MATLAB's pdetool and COMSOL Multiphysics recommended for solving the eigenvalue problem. The discussion emphasizes the complexity of 2D solutions compared to 3D, particularly in handling the first derivative term.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Schrödinger equation in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with Bessel functions and their applications
  • Proficiency in using MATLAB, specifically the pdetool for numerical solutions
  • Knowledge of COMSOL Multiphysics for solving eigenvalue problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties and applications of Bessel functions in quantum mechanics
  • Learn how to implement numerical methods using MATLAB's pdetool for PDEs
  • Investigate the capabilities of COMSOL Multiphysics for solving complex eigenvalue problems
  • Study the differences between 2D and 3D Schrödinger equations, focusing on coordinate transformations
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, applied mathematicians, and engineers working on problems involving potential fields and eigenvalue solutions in two-dimensional systems.

amnon_willi
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I have problem I wish to solve, and I wonder if anyone already delt with it when solving the Schrödinger 2D equation.

say E(x,y) is a scalar field function that complies with

( \frac{d}{dx}2+\frac{d}{dy}2 ) *E(x,y)+k(x,y)*E(x,y)=k1*E(x,y)


where k(x,y)={k2 for x2+y2<R2 and 0 otherwise}, i.e. a tube potential.
All is known but E(x,y).
I think it can be examined as a 2D Schrödinger equation, even thow the eigenvalue k1 is known.

How can I get to start finding the solutions of this equation?
Can I expect to know how many are there? - one, two, many?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At least in 3D, a rotationally invariant system is best dealt with in spherical coordinates, expanding in eigenfunctions of angular momentum and then solving the radial equation, which will be an ODE. In 2D, the "spherical harmonics" are just the functions e^{im \phi} where m is an integer. So try writing f_m(r,\phi) = u_m(r) e^{i m \phi}, which should give you an ordinary differential equation for u_m(r). Then the general solution will be a linear combination of the f_m, ie, you should expect a linearly independent solution for each integer m.

This is a little messier in 2D than in 3D, and the equation will have a first derivative term that doesn't appear in the ordinary Schrödinger equation. In fact, the solutions u_m(r,\phi) are probably going to be Bessel functions.
 
Numerically you could use pdetool within MATLAB (type: pdetool at the MATLAB prompt), where you could solve this eigen value problem in 2D (Its not that you know or could specify k1, you will get it from the numeric solution). Other better program is COMSOL multiphysics.

This problem looks like cylinder symmetry, but depend on weather k(x,y)=f(r) or not. In that case you could obtain an effective 1D eigen value problem in Psi(r), using the angular quantum quantum number m as specified in the other post here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K