Solving using schrodinger equation techniques

amnon_willi
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I have problem I wish to solve, and I wonder if anyone already delt with it when solving the schrodinger 2D equation.

say E(x,y) is a scalar field function that complies with

( \frac{d}{dx}2+\frac{d}{dy}2 ) *E(x,y)+k(x,y)*E(x,y)=k1*E(x,y)


where k(x,y)={k2 for x2+y2<R2 and 0 otherwise}, i.e. a tube potential.
All is known but E(x,y).
I think it can be examined as a 2D schrodinger equation, even thow the eigenvalue k1 is known.

How can I get to start finding the solutions of this equation?
Can I expect to know how many are there? - one, two, many?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At least in 3D, a rotationally invariant system is best dealt with in spherical coordinates, expanding in eigenfunctions of angular momentum and then solving the radial equation, which will be an ODE. In 2D, the "spherical harmonics" are just the functions e^{im \phi} where m is an integer. So try writing f_m(r,\phi) = u_m(r) e^{i m \phi}, which should give you an ordinary differential equation for u_m(r). Then the general solution will be a linear combination of the f_m, ie, you should expect a linearly independent solution for each integer m.

This is a little messier in 2D than in 3D, and the equation will have a first derivative term that doesn't appear in the ordinary schrodinger equation. In fact, the solutions u_m(r,\phi) are probably going to be Bessel functions.
 
Numerically you could use pdetool within MATLAB (type: pdetool at the MATLAB prompt), where you could solve this eigen value problem in 2D (Its not that you know or could specify k1, you will get it from the numeric solution). Other better program is COMSOL multiphysics.

This problem looks like cylinder symmetry, but depend on weather k(x,y)=f(r) or not. In that case you could obtain an effective 1D eigen value problem in Psi(r), using the angular quantum quantum number m as specified in the other post here.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top