Solving Variance Problem: Computing E(\hat{\theta}) and E(\hat{\theta}^2)

  • Thread starter Thread starter mnb96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variance
mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hello,
we are given N independent random variables z_i defined as follows:

z_i = \theta + v_i

where the r.v. v_i are zero-mean normal distributions v_i \sim N(0,\sigma^2).

I want to compute the variance of the estimator

\hat{\theta}=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n z_i

However I can't seem to get the right result (I get always zero).

I computed first E(\hat{\theta})^2=\theta^2.

Then I try to compute E(\hat{\theta^2}) as follows:

\frac{1}{n^2}E\left[\left(\sum_{i=1}^n z_i \right)^2\right] = \frac{1}{n^2}E\left[\left(\sum_{i=1}^n (z_i)^2 \right) + \left(\sum_{i=1}^n z_i \right) \left( \sum_{j\neq i} z_j \right) \right]

= \frac{1}{n^2}E\left[\sum_{i=1}^n z_i^2 \right] + \frac{n-1}{n}\theta^2

= \frac{1}{n^2}E\left[\sum_{i=1}^n (\theta^2 +2\theta v_i + v_i^2) \right] + \frac{n-1}{n}\theta^2

= \frac{1}{n}\theta^2 + \frac{n-1}{n}\theta^2

From this we get Var(\hat{\theta})=E(\hat{\theta}^2)-E(\hat{\theta})^2 = 0.
Where is the mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mnb96 said:
\frac{1}{n^2}E\left[\sum_{i=1}^n (\theta^2 +2\theta v_i + v_i^2) \right] + \frac{n-1}{n}\theta^2

= \frac{1}{n}\theta^2 + \frac{n-1}{n}\theta^2

This is wrong. You dropped the v_i^2 term.
 
uh...that's true! Thanks.

E(v_i^2) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi \sigma^2}}\int_\mathbb{R} x^2 e^\frac{-x^2}{2\sigma^2} dx

This integral is indeed > \\ 0
 
Last edited:
mnb96 said:
uh...that's true! Thanks.

E(v_i^2) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi \sigma^2}}\int_\mathbb{R} x^2 e^\frac{-x^2}{2\sigma^2} dx

This integral is indeed > \\ 0

In fact, E(v_i^2) = \sigma^2.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top