Some questions concerning asymptotic expansions of integrals

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter iccanobif
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on asymptotic expansions of integrals, specifically addressing two key questions regarding the estimation of terms in asymptotic series and the behavior of integrals under the stationary phase method. The first question involves estimating the value of n for the term of least magnitude in the expansion f(x) \asymp \alpha \sum_n a_n x^{-n}. The second question confirms that if the function \phi(t) has no stationary point in the interval [a,b], then the integral I(λ) = ∫ab f(t) exp(iλφ(t)) dt is indeed small due to rapid oscillations causing cancellations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of asymptotic expansions in mathematical analysis
  • Familiarity with the stationary phase method in integral calculus
  • Knowledge of calculus techniques for optimization
  • Basic concepts of complex analysis related to oscillatory integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of asymptotic expansions in mathematical literature
  • Learn about the stationary phase method and its applications in asymptotic analysis
  • Explore techniques for estimating minima and maxima in asymptotic series
  • Investigate the role of oscillatory integrals in complex analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students engaged in advanced calculus, particularly those focusing on asymptotic methods and integral analysis.

iccanobif
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I've started self-teaching asymptotic methods, and I have some theoretic questions (and lots of doubts!).

1. Say I have the asymptotic expansion

f(x) \asymp \alpha \sum_n a_n x^{-n}

for x large, where \alpha is some prefactor.

How can I estimate the value of n for the term of least magnitude?

2. Suppose I have the integral

I(\lambda) = \int_{a}^{b} f(t) \exp{(i\lambda \phi(t))} dt,

for \lambda large.
In the stationary phase method, if the function \phi(t) has no stationary point in the interval [a,b], am I wrong to believe that then I(\lambda) is small beyond all orders (as the rapid oscillations of the phase imply cancellations)? How to formally derive the order of magnitude of I(\lambda)?


Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Two ways that come to mind are
  • If an is defined explicitly, then treat n as if it were a continuous variable and use normal calculus methods to find the minima and maxima of anx-n.
  • Or, solve for n:
    anx-n = an+1x-(n+1)

2. You're correct that the integral would be small. Somebody else will have to chime in on how to figure out the order of magnitude.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K