Somebodies and Nobodies: Overcoming the Abuse of Rank.

  • Thread starter Thread starter polyb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    rank
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on Robert W. Fuller's book "Somebodies and Nobodies," which explores the concept of rankism—abuse based on social rank—rather than focusing solely on traditional -isms like racism and sexism. Fuller argues that rankism manifests in personal relationships as insults to dignity, affecting productivity and learning environments. He highlights how negative motivations in workplaces can be countered by fostering a sense of team and recognition. In educational settings, the fear of rank abuse detracts from learning, while in leadership, rank-based discrimination stifles creativity and potential. The conversation emphasizes the importance of recognizing power dynamics and their impact on social interactions, encouraging critical reflection on personal behavior and its broader implications for societal change.
polyb
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
by Fuller, Robert W

I was wondering if anybody had come across this book by that physicist. It is the same guy that wrote a text I am sure a few of you are pretty familiar with and one that I have found useful as well:

MATHEMATICS OF CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM PHYSICS by Byron, Frederick W, Fuller, Robert W

I recently read through Somebodies and Nobodies and found it was pretty interesting for his means of casting this ubiquitous social problem. It is interesting that he casts all the -ISMS(racism,sexism,etc.) into a more simple framework of abuse according to rank. I found it to be insightful and thought provoking and I was wondering if there was any feedback on this particular book. Of course I would not mind discussing his other book as well! :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RANKISM'S TOLL:

On Personal Relationships

In personal relations, the abuse of rank is experienced subjectively as an insult to dignity. Our antennae are tuned to detect the slightest trace of condescension or indignity in others’ treatment of us. Pulling rank takes the form of disrespect, insults, disdain, 'dissing,' berating, snobbism, and humiliation. It is meant to demean, to exploit, to wound, to harm, and to damage - and it does. Even when not deliberately malicious, rank abuse can still warp and deform our interactions.

On Productivity
While on a visit to Philadelphia, George Washington noticed that free men there could do in "two or three days what would employ [his slaves] a month or more." His explanation that slaves had no chance "to establish a good name [and so were] too regardless of a bad one" was that of a practical man concerned with the bottom line, not that of a moralizer, and therefore all the more telling.

Today, employers are not dealing with slaves, though it is sometimes argued that wage-earners are wage-slaves and salaried employees are only marginally more independent. Negative motivation - fear of demotion or job loss - is now dwarfed by the positive motivation that comes from being part of a team of responsible professionals. Eliminating recognition deficiencies in the work place is proving as good for the bottom line as eliminating nutritional deficiencies was for the productivity of day laborers.

On Learning
The real and imagined threat of rank abuse pervades all our educational institutions from kindergarten through graduate school. Finding and holding one’s position in a hierarchy takes priority over all else. In any institution with gradations of rank, protecting one’s dignity from insult and injury siphons attention and energy away from learning.

No child - no human being - is expendable. Everyone has something to contribute, and when that contribution is made and acknowledged, he or she feels like a somebody. Helping individuals locate that something and contribute it is the proper business of education.

On Leadership
In any institution, rank-based discrimination limits the access of potential high performers to better jobs by inhibiting movement among ranks. It also puts those holding high rank under the kind of stress that gradually undercuts the creativity that brought them success in the first place.

Repeating themselves gradually separates somebodies from their creative source, depleting them until they become empty shells. With enough repetitions, they begin to wonder why they ever thought they had anything to offer. Burnout is the occupational hazard of somebodyness.

On Spirit
Our passions are unique and personal. They grow out of our questions, out of the contradictions we feel with other people, with others’ work, or with society. Initially we wonder Who’s right? What’s beautiful? What’s fair? What’s true? We’re not sure. Our questions generate our individuality. Through our response to them, we define ourselves, we become someone in particular. Rank, social and otherwise, still keeps many from cultivating their questions into life-altering quests.


Though I would provide some thought from his book. Here is a link to the site called:
http://www.breakingranks.net/index.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:



I have not personally read Somebodies and Nobodies, but I have heard of it and have read Mathematics of Classical and Quantum Physics by the same author. I agree with you that Fuller has a unique way of addressing social issues, and his approach to the abuse of rank is definitely thought-provoking.

I think it's important to recognize the power dynamics at play in our society and how they can lead to abuse and mistreatment of those who are perceived as lower on the social hierarchy. By framing it as a problem of rank rather than specific -isms, Fuller highlights the underlying issue and encourages readers to think critically about their own actions and beliefs.

I would love to hear more about your thoughts on the book and how it has impacted your understanding of social issues. Have you found any practical applications of Fuller's ideas in your own life or in your community? It's always interesting to see how theories and concepts can be put into action for positive change.
 
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...
Back
Top