What are the best $20 mathematics of physics books?

  • Other
  • Thread starter TLeit
  • Start date
  • #1
10
2
I have the opportunity to receive a book of up to a $20 value that must be related to mathematics, actuarial science, or education, so I was trying to find a good mathematics of physics or mathematics of chemistry book. Some of the ones I found are:

-Mathematics of Classical and Quantum Physics by Frederick W. Byron and Robert W. Fuller https://www.amazon.com/dp/048667164X/?tag=pfamazon01-20&tag=pfamazon01-20
-Mathematics for Physicists by Philippe Dennery and Andre Krzywicki https://www.amazon.com/dp/0486691934/?tag=pfamazon01-20&tag=pfamazon01-20
-Mathematical Physics by Donald H. Menzel https://www.amazon.com/dp/0486600564/?tag=pfamazon01-20&tag=pfamazon01-20

Are any of these three especially good or are there any other related books that especially stand out? I am particularly interested in quantum physics.

Thank you for any suggestions!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Buffu

Answers and Replies

  • #2
dextercioby
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
13,017
566
I can only recommend the first, by Byron & Fuller. It's very good and I hope you are up for it, if you decide to buy it.
 
  • #3
Dr Transport
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,445
585
All about equal, all three are on my shelf.
 
  • #4
450
244
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
  • #5
atyy
Science Advisor
14,199
2,466
Nearing is free, if one doesn't mind not having it as a physical book. http://www.physics.miami.edu/~nearing/mathmethods/

Bohm is out of date. It contains a huge error, claiming that there cannot be hidden variables in quantum mechanics. It is interesting, because the most famous counterexample was first constructed by Bohm, in response to Einstein's criticism of his textbook.

Penrose is good, but it is not a mathematical physics book, but a popsci book.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #6
450
244
Penrose is good, but it is not a mathematical physics book, but a popsci book.
Penrose is sold as a popsci book but it is mathematical. See the preview. I find it harder to read than the other books I mentioned above :) See the preview.
 
  • Like
Likes Frimus
  • #7
vanhees71
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
16,750
7,998
Nearing is free, if one doesn't mind not having it as a physical book. http://www.physics.miami.edu/~nearing/mathmethods/

Bohm is out of date. It contains a huge error, claiming that there cannot be hidden variables in quantum mechanics. It is interesting, because the most famous counterexample was first constructed by Bohm, in response to Einstein's criticism of his textbook.

Penrose is good, but it is not a mathematical physics book, but a popsci book.
I clicked at your link to Nearing. It's and example for a textbook, one shouldn't even download for free due to typographical sins. I was shocked to see that this was written in LaTeX, and it must have been even very difficult for the author to find settings to get such an ugly result. It starts with using sans-serif fonts (a clear sign that the author doesn't want me to read his text ;-)), but then setting the math in a totally different and unfitting serif font is too much. I've not looked at the contents, and I won't do that. It's just too painful to read!
 
  • Like
Likes smodak and dextercioby
  • #8
512
123
Bohms Quantum Theory is good for its price.
 
  • Like
Likes smodak
  • #9
450
244
I was shocked to see that this was written in LaTeX, and it must have been even very difficult for the author to find settings to get such an ugly result. It starts with using sans-serif fonts (a clear sign that the author doesn't want me to read his text ;-)), but then setting the math in a totally different and unfitting serif font is too much. I've not looked at the contents, and I won't do that. It's just too painful to read!
I was really thinking the same. The print version somehow reads a little better but not much. It has good content though.
 
  • #10
850
146
I clicked at your link to Nearing. It's and example for a textbook, one shouldn't even download for free due to typographical sins. I was shocked to see that this was written in LaTeX, and it must have been even very difficult for the author to find settings to get such an ugly result. It starts with using sans-serif fonts (a clear sign that the author doesn't want me to read his text ;-)), but then setting the math in a totally different and unfitting serif font is too much. I've not looked at the contents, and I won't do that. It's just too painful to read!
I think it is fine. It is comparatively bad but not as bad as you describe it. I can easily read it without searching Ebay for a new pair of eyes.
 
  • Like
Likes smodak
  • #11
450
244
I can easily read it without searching Ebay for a new pair of eyes.
:DD
 
  • #12
Demystifier
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
11,220
3,884
Penrose is good, but it is not a mathematical physics book, but a popsci book.
Penrose is sold as a popsci book but it is mathematical. See the preview. I find it harder to read than the other books I mentioned above :) See the preview.
I would classify Penrose as a semi-popular book. You don't need to be a professional physicist/mathematician to read it, but you also cannot read it if you are a layman.
 
  • Like
Likes smodak and vanhees71

Related Threads on What are the best $20 mathematics of physics books?

Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
11K
Replies
13
Views
61K
Replies
28
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Top