# What are the best $20 mathematics of physics books? • Other I have the opportunity to receive a book of up to a$20 value that must be related to mathematics, actuarial science, or education, so I was trying to find a good mathematics of physics or mathematics of chemistry book. Some of the ones I found are:

-Mathematics of Classical and Quantum Physics by Frederick W. Byron and Robert W. Fuller https://www.amazon.com/dp/048667164X/?tag=pfamazon01-20&tag=pfamazon01-20
-Mathematics for Physicists by Philippe Dennery and Andre Krzywicki https://www.amazon.com/dp/0486691934/?tag=pfamazon01-20&tag=pfamazon01-20
-Mathematical Physics by Donald H. Menzel https://www.amazon.com/dp/0486600564/?tag=pfamazon01-20&tag=pfamazon01-20

Are any of these three especially good or are there any other related books that especially stand out? I am particularly interested in quantum physics.

Thank you for any suggestions!

Last edited by a moderator:
Buffu

dextercioby
Homework Helper
I can only recommend the first, by Byron & Fuller. It's very good and I hope you are up for it, if you decide to buy it.

Dr Transport
Gold Member
All about equal, all three are on my shelf.

Last edited by a moderator:
Demystifier
atyy
Nearing is free, if one doesn't mind not having it as a physical book. http://www.physics.miami.edu/~nearing/mathmethods/

Bohm is out of date. It contains a huge error, claiming that there cannot be hidden variables in quantum mechanics. It is interesting, because the most famous counterexample was first constructed by Bohm, in response to Einstein's criticism of his textbook.

Penrose is good, but it is not a mathematical physics book, but a popsci book.

Last edited by a moderator:
Penrose is good, but it is not a mathematical physics book, but a popsci book.
Penrose is sold as a popsci book but it is mathematical. See the preview. I find it harder to read than the other books I mentioned above :) See the preview.

Frimus
vanhees71
Gold Member
Nearing is free, if one doesn't mind not having it as a physical book. http://www.physics.miami.edu/~nearing/mathmethods/

Bohm is out of date. It contains a huge error, claiming that there cannot be hidden variables in quantum mechanics. It is interesting, because the most famous counterexample was first constructed by Bohm, in response to Einstein's criticism of his textbook.

Penrose is good, but it is not a mathematical physics book, but a popsci book.

smodak and dextercioby
Bohms Quantum Theory is good for its price.

smodak
I was shocked to see that this was written in LaTeX, and it must have been even very difficult for the author to find settings to get such an ugly result. It starts with using sans-serif fonts (a clear sign that the author doesn't want me to read his text ;-)), but then setting the math in a totally different and unfitting serif font is too much. I've not looked at the contents, and I won't do that. It's just too painful to read!
I was really thinking the same. The print version somehow reads a little better but not much. It has good content though.

I think it is fine. It is comparatively bad but not as bad as you describe it. I can easily read it without searching Ebay for a new pair of eyes.

smodak
I can easily read it without searching Ebay for a new pair of eyes.

Demystifier