Someone willing to help me understand this economic model?

Thread starter vanilla_
Start date Apr 18, 2014
Tags

Economic Model

AI Thread Summary

The original poster struggles to understand an economic model and seeks assistance in writing an introduction. They express gratitude for any help offered. A response criticizes the poster for presenting the material in a confusing manner, suggesting it may hinder their chances of receiving help. The discussion highlights the importance of clear communication when seeking assistance. Overall, clarity in presenting questions is essential for effective support in understanding complex topics.

Apr 18, 2014

vanilla_

I have problems understanding the economic model. I need to write an introduction, but unfortunately cannot understand the main point. Will be grateful for any help! Thank you in advance!

Physics news on Phys.org

Apr 18, 2014

phinds

Science Advisor

Insights Author

Gold Member

2024 Award

Seriously? You're asking a significant favor of people to read all that and you post it sideways and out of focus? Good luck with that.

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...

View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

View full post »