Sooo lost (probablility? problem)

  • Thread starter Thread starter jnimagine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lost
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a probability problem involving simulations of histograms related to rolling dice multiple times. Participants are tasked with analyzing the width of the distribution based on varying numbers of rolls and understanding the relationship between FWHM and standard deviation in Gaussian distributions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to clarify the specifics of the distributions being analyzed, including what is plotted on the histograms and the meaning of the "first two possibilities." Questions arise regarding the correlation between the width of the distribution and the number of rolls, as well as the mathematical relationship between FWHM and standard deviation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants seeking clarification on the problem setup and others providing insights into the nature of the distributions and the data being analyzed. There is a recognition of the need for more precise definitions and examples to facilitate understanding.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion about the assignment's content and indicate a lack of prior knowledge on the topic. Specific examples of the number of rolls and repetitions are provided, highlighting variations in the width of the distribution across different scenarios.

jnimagine
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
sooo lost... please help! (probablility? problem)

So, we were given simulations of histograms that has to do with rolling a certain number of dice consecutive times.
and these questions were given...
and I am soo lost as to how to approach these questions.

1. What is a reasonable numerical measure of the width of the distribution?
2. Comparing the first two possibilities should show that the width of the distribution does not depend on the number of times the sets of rolls is repeated. Comparing all the possibilities but the first shows that it does depend on the number of rolls n. How does the width of the distribution correlate with the number of rolls? Be both qualitative and at least semi-quantitative: if n is the number of rolls does the width vary as n, 1/n, the square root of n, one over the square root of n, …

and also, for gaussian distribution, what is the mathematical relationship between FWHM (full width at half the maximum) and the standard deviation?

Please...help me... T.T
 
Physics news on Phys.org


anyone...? :cry:
 


You are probably getting no response because what you wrote makes so little sense.

jnimagine said:
So, we were given simulations of histograms that has to do with rolling a certain number of dice consecutive times.
and these questions were given...
and I am soo lost as to how to approach these questions.

1. What is a reasonable numerical measure of the width of the distribution?
Which distribution? Each time you rolled the dice a certain number of times? What are you plotting horizontally on your histogram?

2. Comparing the first two possibilities should show that the width of the distribution does not depend on the number of times the sets of rolls is repeated.
Comparing what "first two possibilities"?

Comparing all the possibilities but the first shows that it does depend on the number of rolls n. How does the width of the distribution correlate with the number of rolls? Be both qualitative and at least semi-quantitative: if n is the number of rolls does the width vary as n, 1/n, the square root of n, one over the square root of n, …
Again, what "possiblities"? Do you mean each time you rolled a specific number of dice? What are the width and number of rolls for the second trial? What are the width and number of rolls for the second trial? And, of course, what are you plotting, or measuring, along the base of the histograms?

and also, for gaussian distribution, what is the mathematical relationship between FWHM (full width at half the maximum) and the standard deviation?[\quote]
This looks like a question about a given formula. Which formula?

Please...help me... T.T
If you are taking this course, surely you must know something about this.
 


This is an assignment for physics... and I never learned anything about this sort of thing in my life and we're not getting taught anything about it either...

1. Which distribution? Each time you rolled the dice a certain number of times? What are you plotting horizontally on your histogram?

number of rolls on the y-axis and fraction of sevens in the x-axis.
ex. graph shows 36 rolls repeated 4000 times, 72 rolls 500 times etc.

2. Comparing the first two possibilities should show that the width of the distribution does not depend on the number of times the sets of rolls is repeated.

Comparing what "first two possibilities"?
36 rolls repeated 4000 times
36 rolls repeated 1000 times

3. Comparing all the possibilities but the first shows that it does depend on the number of rolls n. How does the width of the distribution correlate with the number of rolls? Be both qualitative and at least semi-quantitative: if n is the number of rolls does the width vary as n, 1/n, the square root of n, one over the square root of n, …

Again, what "possiblities"? Do you mean each time you rolled a specific number of dice? What are the width and number of rolls for the second trial? What are the width and number of rolls for the second trial? And, of course, what are you plotting, or measuring, along the base of the histograms?

- possibilities:
36 rolls repeated 4000 times
36 rolls repeated 1000 times
72 rolls repeated 500 times
144 rolls repeated 250 times
180 rolls repeated 200 times
288 rolls repeated 125 times
360 rolls repeated 100 times

- width varies for all the different possibilites... it seems to get narrower as you go down the list

- base of the histogram is the fraction of sevens

and also, for gaussian distribution, what is the mathematical relationship between FWHM (full width at half the maximum) and the standard deviation?
This looks like a question about a given formula. Which formula?

-no, "To find this you determine where the number of data is one-half of the value of the maximum, i.e. where N(x) = A/2. There will be two such points for a bell shaped curve. Then the FWHM is the difference between the right hand side value and the left hand side value of x." That's all it said and the above question came up.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K