MHB Sopheary dara mao's question at Yahoo Answers regarding kinematics

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Calculus Antiderivative problem.?

A stone is thrown straight up from the edge of a roof, 800 feet above the ground, at a speed of 14 feet per second.
A. Remembering that the acceleration due to gravity is -32 feet per second squared, how high is the stone 2 seconds later?
B. At what time does the stone hit the ground?
C. What is the velocity of the stone when it hits the ground?

Here is a link to the question:

Calculus Antiderivative problem.? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello sopheary dara mao,

I would orient the vertical $x$-axis of motion such that the origin coincides with the initial position of the stone, and model the motion of the stone with the IVP (where $x$ is measured in feet and time $t$ is measured in seconds):

$$x''(t)=-g$$ where $$x'(0)=v_0$$ and $$x(0)=x_0$$

Integrating once, we find:

$$x'(t)=v(t)=-gt+C$$

Using the initial conditions, we find:

$$v_0=C$$ hence:

$$v(t)=-gt+v_0$$

Integrating again, we find:

$$x(t)=-\frac{g}{2}t^2+v_0t+C$$

Using the initial conditions, we find:

$$x_0=C$$ hence:

$$x(t)=-\frac{g}{2}t^2+v_0t+x_0$$

Now, using the given data and orientation of our coordinate system, i.e:

$$g=32,\,v_0=14,\,x_0=0$$ we have:

$$x(t)=-16t^2+14t$$

$$v(t)=-32t+14$$

Now we are ready to answer the questions:

A.) $$x(2)=-16(2)^2+14(2)=-36$$

This means after 2 seconds the stone is 36 feet below its initial position, or 764 ft above the ground.

B.) To find at what time the stone hits the ground, we may set:

$$x(t)=-800$$

$$-16t^2+14t=-800$$

$$16t^2-14t-800=0$$

$$2\left(8t^2-7t-400 \right)=0$$

Applying the quadratic formula, and taking the positive root, we find:

$$t=\frac{7+\sqrt{12849}}{16}\approx7.5221$$

C.) $$v\left(\frac{7+\sqrt{12849}}{16} \right)=-32\left(\frac{7+\sqrt{12849}}{16} \right)+14=-2\sqrt{12849}$$

The negative sign indicates the stone is moving in a downward direction when it hits the ground. This is in agreement with the speed when using energy considerations, i.e., equating initial energy (gravitational potential and kinetic) to final energy (kinetic) and solving for the final velocity.

To sopheary dara mao and any other guests viewing this topic, I invite and encourage you to post other kinematics questions in either our http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f10/ forum if the calculus is to be used or our http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f22/ forum if energy considerations, or other pre-calculus techniques are to be used.

Best Regards,

Mark.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top