Sound pressure level magnitude question.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the sound pressure level (SPL) increase from a starting point of 150 decibels to a level that represents a 1000 times increase in sound pressure. The logarithmic relationship of sound pressure is highlighted, with a suggestion that to achieve this increase, one would need to increase the distance from the sound source significantly, resulting in an approximate SPL of 210 dB. This level is described as extraordinarily loud, beyond typical human tolerance, with 0 dB being the threshold of hearing and 130 dB the threshold of pain. The conversation also touches on the inverse-square law related to sound intensity and distance. Overall, achieving a 1000 times increase in sound pressure from 150 dB results in a theoretical SPL that is impractically high.
soundguy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

I've got an audio related question for you guys/gals:

I understand the logarithmic relationship to SPL, but would someone help me out with a simple question and post a formula as to how you arrive at an answer? Assuming a start value of 150 decibels, what pressure level would represent a magnitude of 1000 times increase over 150dB?

-As a side note, cool forum! Everything from mathematics to religion and alien abduction; you don't find that often! I'm sure I'll be spending too much free time reading threads in the future. :biggrin:

Thanks!
 
Science news on Phys.org
soundguy said:
Hey all,

I've got an audio related question for you guys/gals:

I understand the logarithmic relationship to SPL, but would someone help me out with a simple question and post a formula as to how you arrive at an answer? Assuming a start value of 150 decibels, what pressure level would represent a magnitude of 1000 times increase over 150dB?

do you mean, what dB level for 1000 times more sound pressure? or what is the pressure level for 150,000 dB :eek: (i think 150,000 dB SPL will liquify everything.)

-As a side note, cool forum! Everything from mathematics to religion and alien abduction; you don't find that often! I'm sure I'll be spending too much free time reading threads in the future. :biggrin:
Thanks!

i don't deal with the alien abduction and haven't seen any religion here.

but i don't do all of the forums.
 
rbj said:
do you mean, what dB level for 1000 times more sound pressure? or what is the pressure level for 150,000 dB :eek: (i think 150,000 dB SPL will liquify everything.)

Right on the first part...what sound pressure level would be 1000 times more spl than 150db.

i don't deal with the alien abduction and haven't seen any religion here.

but i don't do all of the forums
It's down in the Lounge and Philosophy sections.
 
No one? :confused:
 
soundguy said:
Right on the first part...what sound pressure level would be 1000 times more spl than 150db.

well, think of pressure like voltage and particle velocity like current. for example, a spherically expanding sound wave will obey the inverse-square law as far as power (more specifically, intensity, which is power per unit area) so the power or intensity is reduced by a factor of 4 (or and additive gain of -6.02 dB) every time the distance from the point source is double. also, for a sound wave front, the r.m.s. pressure times the r.m.s. particle velocity (the component of the particle velocity that is in-phase with the pressure wave) multiply to be intensity, and it also turns out that both are 1/r. so to reduce the magnitude of the pressure wave by a factor of 1000, i would have to increase my distance by a factor of 1000, which means i double it about 10 times (210 = 1024) so that would be about 60 dB. (in fact it would be exactly 60 dB if you look at the exact definition of dB.) so i guess your answer is 210 dB which is so friggin' loud, only a martyr or a masochist would be willing to be subjected to it. 0 dB is roughly the threshold of hearing and 130 is roughly the threshold of pain and 150 dB is louder than anything i would ever want to hear.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top