Space elevator minimum initial speed

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the minimum initial speed required for an object to escape Earth's gravitational influence and the height needed for a space elevator to launch objects into space. The initial escape velocity is calculated using conservation of energy, while the height for the elevator must exceed a specific radius to ensure an object released with zero radial velocity can escape. The geostationary orbit radius is derived from balancing gravitational and centrifugal forces. There is confusion regarding the differences between the escape conditions for the two scenarios presented. Overall, the calculations emphasize the importance of understanding gravitational dynamics in the context of space elevators.
RiotRick
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the far future, humans have built a space elevator as a cheap
means of access to space. However before that could be done, a few basic principles had to be
worked out. . .

a)
What is the minimum initial speed (in an Earth-centered inertial reference frame) needed
for an object launching from the Earth surface (r = rE) to escape its gravitational influence
entirely? You can rely on conservation of energy.

b)
Objects can be launched into space from the elevator “just” by moving them up the elevator,
until a certain height, and then releasing them (with zero radial velocity). What is the
height ##r_{esc}## (as measured from the centre of the Earth) the elevator needs to have so that
the released object would ultimately escape the Earth’s gravitational influence? Careful:
the escape speed has not the same value as for the previous question.

Homework Equations


The previous question asked for the initial escape velocity.
##F_G = G*\frac{M*m}{r^2}##

The Attempt at a Solution



a) is solved via conservation of energy

b) Here I don't fully understand the question. The "careful" makes me suspicious. Do I set centrifugal force equal to the gravitational force or does it ask for the tangential velocity? So I'd have to set the tangential velocity equal to the escape velocity
##\omega*r=\sqrt(\frac{2GM}{r})##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First work out what the distance R from the Earth's centre must be for a free-falling geostationary satellite, by equating the formula for required centripetal acceleration (to maintain a circular orbit) to that for gravitational acceleration and solving for radius.

A free-falling object that momentarily has a geostationary velocity will escape the Earth if it is beyond the distance R, and will fall to Earth if it is less than that distance (Why?).

So if the top of the elevator is a satellite at distance beyond the distance R, tethered to Earth by the cable, the object can be released as soon as it is materially beyond distance R.
 
I should have posted all the questions:

a)
Is there a circular orbit for which an object would hover continuously above the same
point on Earth? What is the radius rGSO of that geostationary orbit? Hint: for a circular
trajectory, the centrifugal force experienced by the object balances the gravitational pull
from the Earth.
b)
The space elevator starts at a base station on Earth at the equator, crosses geostationary
orbit and extends even further out into space. The whole structure revolves
with the Earth, at the same angular velocity. What is the direction of the force experienced
by an object positioned along the elevator below rGSO? Above?
c)
What is the minimum initial speed (in an Earth-centered inertial reference frame) needed
for an object launching from the Earth surface (r = rE) to escape its gravitational influence
entirely? Hints: in the worst case, the object’s speed would approach zero when r ! 1.
You can rely on conservation of energy.
d)
Objects can be launched into space from the elevator “just” by moving them up the elevator,
until a certain height, and then releasing them (with zero radial velocity). What is the
height resc (as measured from the centre of the Earth) the elevator needs to have so that
the released object would ultimately escape the Earth’s gravitational influence? Careful:
the escape speed has not the same value as for the previous question.

My solutions:
b) what you pointed out
a) ## r_{GSO}=(frac{GMT^2}{4*\pi^2})^{1/2) ##

c) ## v=\sqrt(\frac{2GM}{r_E}) ##

Now how is d) different from a) and b)?

I don't know what's wrong with my LaTex format
 
The answers to (a) and (d) ARE radii, while the answer to (b) is a direction, so we only need to find a difference between (a) and (d). The answer is the same, but not tautologously so. An argument is needed to justify the conclusion that the greatest lower bound of radii at which a release with zero velocity relative to the elevator will lead to escape is the same as the geostationary radius.

RiotRick said:
I don't know what's wrong with my LaTex format
See the red parenthesis:

r_{GSO}=(frac{GMT^2}{4*\pi^2})^{1/2)

Also, the backslash is missing from before the frac.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top