Space Genetics: A Weird Physics Theory on Mass, Radiation, and the Universe

  • Thread starter Thread starter heusdens
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Genetics Space
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a theory called "Space Genetics," proposed by a Russian physicist, Dr. Dark Energy, which suggests that mass consumes space while radiation from stars creates it, resulting in a universe in equilibrium. The theory is controversial as it aligns with the static/steady state model, which is largely rejected by the scientific community. Participants express skepticism about the validity of the theory, noting that Dr. Dark Energy is not a professional physicist but rather a teacher. There is a call for arguments to critique the theory, indicating a desire for deeper analysis. Overall, the conversation highlights the contentious nature of unconventional theories in cosmology.
heusdens
Messages
1,736
Reaction score
0
Here is a link to weird physics theory, called "Space genetics" by some russian physiscts (Dr. Dark Energy), who has a theory in which mass "consumes" space, and radiation by stars "creates" back the space consumed by mass...creating in fact a universe in perfect equilibrium of finite size but with infinite history.

http://www.geocities.com/igorelik/index.html".

Anyone wanting to comment on this?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Just be aware that as you read his theory that he is not a professional physicist and that he adheres to the static/steady state model of the universe which has been rejected by the majority of professionals.
 
He was/is a physics teacher.
 
Originally posted by Phobos
Just be aware that as you read his theory that he is not a professional physicist and that he adheres to the static/steady state model of the universe which has been rejected by the majority of professionals.

It's not precisely a static/steady state model, at least not the based on the cosmological theory that was called "static/steady state" model. Although he clearly rejects the Big Bang model.

But come with arguments, why is his theory wrong?
 
Originally posted by heusdens
But come with arguments, why is his theory wrong?

Good question. If I have time, I'll try to comment on it soon. Anyone else?
 
Originally posted by Phobos
Good question. If I have time, I'll try to comment on it soon. Anyone else?
Hubble?
 
Originally posted by russ_watters
Hubble?

Have you actually READ the theory of space genetics?
 
Back
Top