Space Station Crew Discovers Dangerous Leak Between Pods - Apollo 13 Parallels

AI Thread Summary
A leak discovered between pods on the International Space Station has raised safety concerns, drawing parallels to the Apollo 13 incident. The leak was linked to recent solar activity from sunspot groups 484 and 486, which may be impacting the ISS. Critical sensors monitoring air, water quality, and radiation levels have been malfunctioning for months, despite warnings from NASA medical experts about the risks of continuing missions. Funding issues are highlighted as a significant barrier to maintaining equipment and ensuring astronaut safety. The discussion emphasizes the need for multinational collaboration in space exploration to enhance resources and prevent potential disasters.
Zeropaxx
incase anyone cares. The bump in the night that the crew of the International space station heard was that of a leak, between pods. There will be a "BOOOM!" if you know what I mean. I guess kind of like Apollo 13.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Sunspot Groups 484 & 486

A year ago, we were warned;
http://www.spacetoday.net/Summary/1262
Its not hard to see what’s going on here. Sunspot Groups 484 and 486 are blasting Earth and the poor ISS;
http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20031127-090739-7747r.htm
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=624&ncid=624&e=1&u=/ap/20031127/ap_on_sc/russia_space_noise
Oh Gee, the Mars Instruments fail once more (C’mon NASA. Stop treating the public like idiots!)
http://www.spacetoday.net/Summary/2048
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2003/12nov_haywire.htm?list754076

In New Scientist (1 November 2003 edition) there is an article on Page 4 entitled “Would You Boldly Go?”;
“Being an astronaut on the space station just got riskier. Sensors that monitor air and water quality as well as radiation levels have been broken for a number of months. And systems that monitor the crew’s vital signs have been producing irregular data.
Yet NASA’s latest mission to the space station was approved despite the concerns of two of its medical experts about the “the continued degradation” of equipment, according to the minutes of a meeting at Johnson Space Center in Houston.

In September, two NASA medical experts refused to sign flight certificates authorising the mission. …”

That’s just for starters. I won’t even bother posting my conversations with Dr. SOHO. I'd be worried if I was up on the ISS.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
i think the real future in space exploration lies in multinational agencies. there's some collaboration now, but if more countries contributed to a single program, think how much more funding they'd have! funding seems to be the main problem now, as nasa's budget along with every other program is shrinking. many many many accidents could be avoided if they had the necessary funds to keep instruments and equipment well-maintained.

the public will more than likely call for an end to NASA if there's another catastrophe. that's not the answer though, our future lies in space.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top