Space & Time from Spinorial Structures: A Crazy Observation

  • Thread starter K S Mallesh
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Space Time
In summary, the conversation discusses the relationship between spinors and spacetime. It is suggested that the triplet and singlet states, arising from two spin 1/2 structures, can be seen as the basis for 3-dimensional space and 1-dimensional time. It is also mentioned that spinors can be seen as "square roots" of vectors and that there is a connection between the Lorentz group and the bispinor structure.
  • #1
K S Mallesh
4
0
I often feel think that the three-dimensional space and the one-dimensional time can be viewed as arising due to a basic spinorial structure. I am drawing an analogy with the triplet and singlet states which arise when two spin 1/2 are added. Can we say that space and time basically arise from the coupling of two spinorial structures, the triplet combination giving the 3-d space and the singlet combination giving the 1-dimensional time?

Please bear with me if my observation looks very crazy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
There is a relationship between spacetime and spinors, but it isn't the one that you think (although I will ponder upon it).

You can assign to every 4-vector satisfying [tex]v^2 = 1[/tex] a 2x2 special unitary matrix satisfying [tex]\det u = 1[/tex], etc. Now SU(2) matrices transform as two copies of SU(2), whereas spinors transform as one copy. So it is often said that spinors are "square roots" of vectors.

There's a related construction for null vectors and this goes by the name of twistors.
 
  • #3
the basic space time group : Lorentz group can be decomposed into SU(2)XSU(2). So you see all inertial frames are basically connected by a bispinor structure...
 

1. What is the main concept behind "Space & Time from Spinorial Structures: A Crazy Observation"?

The main concept behind "Space & Time from Spinorial Structures: A Crazy Observation" is that the fundamental structure of space and time can be described using spinors, which are mathematical objects that represent the intrinsic spin of particles. This theory suggests that the spinorial structure of space and time is responsible for the properties and behavior of matter and energy in the universe.

2. How does this theory differ from traditional theories of space and time?

This theory differs from traditional theories of space and time, such as Einstein's theory of general relativity, in that it focuses on the fundamental structure of space and time rather than their effects on matter and energy. It also incorporates spinors, which have not been extensively explored in traditional theories.

3. What evidence supports this theory?

Currently, there is no direct evidence that supports this theory. However, the mathematical framework of spinors has been successful in describing other phenomena in physics, such as the behavior of elementary particles. Further research and experimentation will be needed to gather evidence for this theory.

4. What implications does this theory have for our understanding of the universe?

If this theory is proven to be correct, it could have significant implications for our understanding of the universe. It could potentially provide a more fundamental and unified understanding of space and time, and could also lead to new insights into the behavior of matter and energy.

5. What further research is needed to explore this theory?

To further explore this theory, more research is needed in both theoretical and experimental aspects. This could include developing new mathematical models and conducting experiments to test the predictions of the theory. Collaboration between different fields of physics, such as particle physics and cosmology, will also be important in advancing our understanding of the spinorial structure of space and time.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
921
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
914
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
3
Replies
87
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
924
Back
Top