Space-Time Relativity: Finite Time & Measuring Time

Topleft
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If time and space are relative, then if the amount of space is finite, is the amount of time finite? Is it possible to measure the amount of time for a given space?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Topleft said:
If time and space are relative, then if the amount of space is finite, is the amount of time finite? Is it possible to measure the amount of time for a given space?
There is no such thing as "the amount of time for a given space". It doesn't work like that. I think your concept of what "relativity" means is confused and I recommend that you do some reading on the basics. Start with special relativity.
 
Topleft said:
then if the amount of space is finite, is the amount of time finite?

Presumably you are defining an an arbitrary finite volume or length and wondering about the time in such a finite space.

Give that question some thought: Has your definition of such a finite volume for inspection changed the volume in any way? What about the time 'surrounding' that finite volume...has it changed in any way? Has the time within that finite volume changed in anyway?

Otherwise, in our universe, we have no evidence space is actually finite...although it's possible.

Hope that helps clarify your thinking.

Further, that 'space and time are relative' refers to the fact that different observers may make different observations because their space and time may be mixed together in different combinations.

How about the two blind men inspecting parts of an elephant: one finds and big thick trunk, the other a skinny tail? Who is right? Another simple example of how observers may see 'space', size, differently are the different perspectives of an observer close to a house [house looks big] and that of a distant observer [house looks small]. Who is 'right'?

Until Einstein, scientists did not understand that space and time are part of a common and related continum. Your space and your time may be different from mine. THAT was a revolutionary scientific insight.
 
Topleft said:
If time and space are relative, then if the amount of space is finite, is the amount of time finite?

There is a flaw in your logic here, and I can show this by coming up with a simple example.

Let's say you have in infinite square well, a very common example in many textbooks. The "space" here is in between the two boundaries of the well, so it is "finite". I can solve for the standing wave that fits into that space, and get an infinite series, in principle, of solutions that can exist within that space.

So already I have an example where a finite space does NOT imply an automatically finite behavior of other properties.

Whenever you come up with a scenario or question such as this, you must also include a compelling argument on why it is so. In this case, you need to come up with not only a compelling argument on why one property must mimic the property of another, but also supply an "example" that support your argument. Otherwise, you are engaging in a fishing expedition.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
There is a flaw in your logic here, and I can show this by coming up with a simple example.

Let's say you have in infinite square well, a very common example in many textbooks. The "space" here is in between the two boundaries of the well, so it is "finite". I can solve for the standing wave that fits into that space, and get an infinite series, in principle, of solutions that can exist within that space.

So already I have an example where a finite space does NOT imply an automatically finite behavior of other properties.

I am lost as to how the space of an infinite well is finite. However, if you are stating a basic fact that of two relative quantities one can be infinite, and the other finite, then you are challenging my definition of the word relative. I am still lost, please help.
 
Topleft said:
I am lost as to how the space of an infinite well is finite. However, if you are stating a basic fact that of two relative quantities one can be infinite, and the other finite, then you are challenging my definition of the word relative. I am still lost, please help.

Your best bet will be to follow the suggestion that phinds made in post #2: "do some reading on the basics. Start with special relativity". That way you'll be able to see how space and time work together.

There are a number of good presentations on how special relativity works that require no more math than high school algebra. Find one of these, and get going...

I'm closing this thread - an internet forum isn't the right place to build a foundation, although we can help you with specific problems that you may encounter as you try to learn SR.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top