Space travel, mass increase, and length shorteneing

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on key aspects of Einstein's theory of relativity, specifically space travel, mass increase with speed, and length contraction. It clarifies that mass is not merely the quantity of matter but an intrinsic property, distinguishing between rest mass and relativistic mass. As an object approaches the speed of light, it requires infinite energy to reach that speed, leading to an increase in relativistic mass. Time dilation occurs because, at high speeds, time for the traveler slows down relative to stationary observers, making ten minutes for the traveler equivalent to months for those on Earth. The participant expresses a growing understanding of these concepts, particularly how acceleration and force relate to mass increase.
Masest
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Alright, i have a final and i have to explain just three parts to einstein's theory of relativity... they are space travel (time slowing nearing the speed of light), increase of mass with speed, and length contraction... the space travel makes no sense, and the mass one, i have mixed feelings about... i know that mass is the amount of matter something has, but as somethign speeds up, it gets more matter? it doesn't make sense... and the length contraction seems backwards too... normally when you see a car fly by really fast, it looks a little longer... man if i were einstein, then i would know, but seeing as how i am just in high school, it doesn't make to much sense... please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Masest said:
Alright, i have a final and i have to explain just three parts to einstein's theory of relativity... they are space travel (time slowing nearing the speed of light), increase of mass with speed, and length contraction... the space travel makes no sense, and the mass one, i have mixed feelings about... i know that mass is the amount of matter something has, but as somethign speeds up, it gets more matter? it doesn't make sense... and the length contraction seems backwards too... normally when you see a car fly by really fast, it looks a little longer... man if i were einstein, then i would know, but seeing as how i am just in high school, it doesn't make to much sense... please help

the problem is that you don't have the right definition of mass. it isn't the quantity of matter, that's the mole. mass is just an intrinsic property of matter. Even the new generation of scientist don't know anything about mass. (see higgs boson).
You have to understand that formula in this way: No physical system with a mass M different from zero can reach the speed of light c. Otherwise you need an infinite amount of energy.
In any case i think you are confusing the rest mass Mo which is always the same and the relativistic mass M=Mo/sqrt(1-beta^2). what remain constant and gives you the conservation (lorentz invariant) is the square of the 4 momentum. which is
p^2 wher p=(E,P) P is the common 3-dim momentum.
 
im sorry i have just check your ID.
i think that what i have told you in the last part is a little bit too much 4 high school.
well in any case try on wikipedia maybe it can be more clear.
especially it is written in english. i think i cannot comunicate in this language as well as in italian.

bye
marco
 
lol... it is fine... i think i am starting to get it... there are two mass types... one is relativistic, moving mass, and the invarient mass is resting mass... i think i found out the spave travel one... time slows down relative to you because your body adjusted to that speed, and that is going to be normal speed for you, and your heartbeat will adjust to it too... relative to people on earth, you are moving very fast (ver very very fast XD) and there body is set for that speed... so ten minutes to you is going to be like three months to them... the mass is going to increase, the relativistic mass, because i think that the force needed to push it using the equation F=MA will increase, and the acceleration will stay the same, therefore making the mass have to increase
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top