Space Waste Disposal: A Sustainable Solution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LasTSurvivoR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space
AI Thread Summary
Proposing to dispose of waste in space raises concerns about the risks of rocket failures potentially spreading hazardous materials back to Earth, although this argument is often deemed invalid due to the safety of existing space technology. Space-based radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs) have successfully contained radioactive materials under extreme conditions, suggesting that similar methods could be applied to waste disposal. However, the high costs associated with space disposal and the current effectiveness of terrestrial storage make this approach unnecessary. Radioactive waste is not as significant a problem as often portrayed; it is managed safely, with much of it being recoverable material. Overall, the discussion emphasizes that while space disposal is theoretically feasible, it is impractical and unwarranted given existing solutions.
LasTSurvivoR
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Instead of throwing waste to seas, why don't we throw out the waste to the space with a specially designed shuttle to throw it away and return to Earth ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Who throws radioactive waste out at sea? High level waste (fission products recovered from spent fuel) tends to be stored dissolved in nitric acid in cooled stainless steel tanks. There are liquid effluent discharges but these tend to make up a small minority of the total radioactive inventory from spent fuel.

Shooting stuff into space always has the associated hazard of possibly ending up back spread all over the Earth due to a rocket failure - not the kind of environmental hazard even BP would contemplate at the moment!
 
Actually, while you will often hear the "launch vehicle could explode and then radioactivity would be dispersed everywhere" argument, I don't think it's actually a valid argument.

Look at the space-based RTGs we've been using ever since pretty much the beginning of space exploration. They have the radioactive material packaged up in a container which will survive the most extreme conditions, including catastrophic failure of the launch vehicle and even atmospheric reentry without releasing the radioactivity.

So clearly if we wanted to shoot radioactive waste into space it is possible to do so with no danger.

The real reasons are simply that it would be incredibly expensive and it's just not necessary.

Radioactive waste is not a huge drama or problem like some people imply it to be.
There's not that much of it, it's being stored safely, most of it is useful material, and it hasn't ever hurt anyone.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Back
Top