Spacecraft Maneuverability: G-Forces in Space?

AI Thread Summary
In space, G-forces can still be felt during rapid maneuvers, similar to those experienced in jets on Earth, primarily due to inertia. The ability to turn quickly and accelerate in a spacecraft is contingent on the strength of the propulsion systems rather than atmospheric conditions. Sci-fi depictions often misrepresent realistic space maneuverability, as true space travel lacks the aerodynamic principles seen in atmospheric flight. The concept of "hyperspace" is a fictional device, as reaching light speed is not feasible according to Einstein's theories. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for future space travel, especially at significant fractions of the speed of light.
whiterecluse
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I was watching Star Wars and started to wonder. If a man were flying a spacecraft in space, would he be able to turn quickly and speed up quickly? Or would there still be a G force like in jets on earth? Kind of hard for me to explain it. I know that the jets now days can turn faster than the pilots can handle. Would the same physics laws apply in space? And what about when they go into "hyper space"? Can our bodies moving that fast all of the sudden?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes you can feel G force in space, and this would be a major hurdle if/when we travel at significant fractions of the speed of light.

In the some sci fi books they have to speed for many months to avoid high G force. Then they have to slow down for many months as well. THis could however help with the need for gravity in space i think?
 
the forces still exist in space. the forces or g's are directly related to the inertia of the moving body.
 
Last edited:
whiterecluse said:
I was watching Star Wars and started to wonder. If a man were flying a spacecraft in space, would he be able to turn quickly and speed up quickly?
First, forget about anything you see in an 'entertainment' type movie. If you want to see realistic space manoeuvring, check out 'Marooned' or '2001'. If you see a fighter or whatever swooping into a nice banked turn, it's only for artistic reasons. You need wings interacting with air to do that. How many gees can be pulled in a movement is entirely dependent upon the strength of you propulsion units. And 'hyperspace' is just a slick way to avoid the fact that you can't reach light speed in Einsteinian space. If you ever have a chance to play an old 'Asteroids' arcade game, you'll have a better idea of how a real spaceship would behave. :cool:
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top