Spacelike and Timelike singuralites

  • Thread starter Thread starter off-diagonal
  • Start date Start date
off-diagonal
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I've read about Schwarzschild and Kerr metric, I confused about the spacelike singularity(occur in non-rotating metric) and timelike singularity (Kerr, RN).

In Schwarzschild case, when we cross and event horizon r=2M metric component switch sign between time and radial component of metric tensor. That cause to the unavoidable trip to the singularity at r=0 when cross the event horizon. But In the Kerr black hole, There is a timelike singularity which one can avoid to reach the "ring singularity" of Kerr metric.

My question is, What is Timelike and Spacelike singularity? What is the different between them?

How can I physically interpret the significant of sign switching of g_{tt} when across the particular surface?

PS , for Schwarzschild this surface appears once at event horizon, however, for the Kerr metric the sign has changed twices, i.e. Infinite redshift surface S^{\pm}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You probably have to look at the definitions of spacetime singularities in terms of geodesic incompleteness. The singularity is where the geodesic is trying to go if you were able to extend it.

For the behaviour of the Schwarzschild metric at the horizon, you may need to switch to Kruskal coordinates (google will turn lots of information up) to see what is or isn't happening there.

I think (hopefully some expert will correct this if I'm wrong!): in a geodesically incomplete (i.e. singular) spacetime, a spacelike singularity is where timelike geodesics would like to end up, and a timelike singularity is where spacelike geodesics would like to end up.
 
Last edited:
This might also shed some light on the difference-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penrose%E2%80%93Hawking_singularity_theorems"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top