Proving Equivalence of Subspaces: x+y+z=0

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dafe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Span Subspace
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that if x, y, and z are vectors such that x+y+z=0, then the subspaces spanned by x and y are equivalent to those spanned by y and z. It is established that the linear dependence of the vectors means they can only span subspaces of dimensions 0, 1, or 2. By expressing vectors in terms of each other, it is shown that any vector in the span of x and y can also be represented as a linear combination of y and z, and vice versa. This mutual representation confirms that the subspaces spanned by x and y and by y and z are indeed the same. The proof concludes with a clear demonstration of the equivalence of the two subspaces.
Dafe
Messages
144
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Here's a statement, and I am supposed to show that it holds.

If x,y, and z are vectors such that x+y+z=0, then x and y span the same subspace as y and z.


Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



If x+y+z=0 it means that the set {x,y,z} of vectors is linearly dependent. Because of this dependence, the vectors cannot span a subspace with dimension greater than 2.
That is, they can span subspaces with dimensions 0,1 and 2.

  • If they span a subspace with dim=0, then x=y=z=0.
  • If they span a subspace with dim=1, then two vectors are negative multiples of each other with the third one being the zero vector.
  • If they span a subspace with dim=2, then one is a linear combination (with -1 as coefficients) of the other two.

In all these cases x and y span the same subspace as y and z.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are missing the point of the question.

Let v be in the subspace spanned by x and y. Then v= ax+ by for some numbers a and b. But x+ y+ z= 0 so x= -y- z. v= a(-y- z)+ by= (b-a)y+ (-a)z. That is, v is a linear combination of y and z and so is in the span of y and z.

That proves that the subspace spanned by x and y is a subspace of the span of y and z. I will leave it to you to show that the span of y and z is a subspace of the span of x and y.

Let v be in the subspace spanned by y and z, Then v= ...
 
Ah, I certainly missed the point of the question!

Let v be in the subspace spanned by y and z.
Then v=ay+bz for some numbers a and b.
But x+y+z=0 so z=-x-y.
v=(a-b)y+(-bx), that is, v is a linear combination of y and x and so is in the span of y and x.
This proves that the subpsace spanned by y and z is a subspace of the span of y and x.

We have now proved that the subspace spanned by x and y is the same as the one spanned by y and z.

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K