Special Relativity and direction of travel

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of direction of travel on time dilation in the context of special relativity. Participants explore how time dilation is perceived by an outside observer when a spaceship approaches the speed of light, considering various scenarios including linear and circular motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that a clock on a spaceship moving towards an observer should appear to speed up, while it should slow down when moving away, raising questions about the influence of direction on time dilation.
  • Another participant clarifies that time dilation is measured by comparing clocks when the spaceship is next to the observer, leading to the conclusion that the time dilation factor is independent of the direction of velocity.
  • A different viewpoint introduces the concept of the relativistic Doppler effect, which does depend on the direction of motion when measuring the frequency of a radio wave sent from the spaceship to the observer.
  • Participants discuss the implications of circular motion, with one stating that special relativity only addresses straight motion at constant velocity, while another argues that circular motion can be analyzed without invoking general relativity under certain conditions.
  • There is a suggestion that the Lorentz factor applies to circular motion as well, but it requires evaluation at each point along the circular path.
  • Confusion arises regarding the relationship between circular motion and straight lines, indicating a lack of consensus on the interpretation of these concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effects of direction on time dilation and the applicability of special relativity to circular motion. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the nature of motion and the definitions of time dilation and the Lorentz factor. The implications of circular motion and its treatment within special relativity versus general relativity are also not fully resolved.

hrob64
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
As I have read, a clock in a spaceship approaching the speed of light will appear to slow down in time from the point of view of an outside stationary observer. Does the direction of travel of the spaceship relative to the observer have an effect? If it is traveling towards the observer it seems to me like it should speed up in time, and slow down when moving away? Furthermore, what would the time dilation be to the observer if the spaceship was moving in a circle around the observer? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The standard way of talking about this is that time dilation is measured by comparing clocks while the ship is next to the observer, and then comparing later when it's next to the observer again. By this definition, the time dilation is given by the factor [itex]\gamma=1/\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}[/itex], which is independent of the direction of the velocity v.

If you do it instead by measuring the frequency of a radio wave sent from the spaceship to the observer, then you get the relativistic Doppler shift http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativistic_Doppler_effect , which does depend on the direction of motion.

-Ben
 
welcome to pf!

hi hrob64! welcome to pf! :smile:
hrob64 said:
As I have read, a clock in a spaceship approaching the speed of light will appear to slow down in time from the point of view of an outside stationary observer. Does the direction of travel of the spaceship relative to the observer have an effect? If it is traveling towards the observer it seems to me like it should speed up in time, and slow down when moving away?

ah, you're confusing how it appears to how we measure it

yes, if the speed of the clock is v = c times tanh(x),

then looking through a telescope, the clock's rate will be multiplied by ex (ie faster) if the clock is approaching the observer, and by e-x (ie slower) if the clock is going away from the observer,

but the observer knows that he is always looking at the past, and when he accounts for that, he finds the clock (in both cases) is going slower by 1/cosh(x), = √(1 - v2/c2)
Furthermore, what would the time dilation be to the observer if the spaceship was moving in a circle around the observer?

the same, √(1 - v2/c2)
 
hrob64 said:
... Furthermore, what would the time dilation be to the observer if the spaceship was moving in a circle around the observer? Thanks

That would involve General Relativity. Special relativity only treats straight motion at constant velocity.
 
danR said:
That would involve General Relativity. Special relativity only treats straight motion at constant velocity.

As long as we are dealing with a manifold with the property of global flatness then circular motion doesn't require GR. The same lorentz factor would apply and I think you would just have to evaluate it at each point of the circular path.
 
WannabeNewton said:
As long as we are dealing with a manifold with the property of global flatness then circular motion doesn't require GR. The same lorentz factor would apply and I think you would just have to evaluate it at each point of the circular path.

I see. And that would be homologous with looking out at a circle of infinite diameter?
 
danR said:
Special relativity only treats straight motion at constant velocity.

no, special relativity is about the Lorentz transformation , and that converts any description of motion in (x,y,z,t) coordinates to a description in different (possibly instantaneous) (x'.y',z',t') coordinates

as WannabeNewton :smile: says …
WannabeNewton said:
The same lorentz factor would apply and … you would just have to evaluate it at each point of the circular path.
danR said:
And that would be homologous with looking out at a circle of infinite diameter?

uhh? :redface: do you mean a straight line? :confused:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
13K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K