Special Relativity - Rocket problem (particle mechanics)

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
Thales Castro
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Problem statement:
A rocket propels itself rectilinearly by giving portions of its mass a constant (backward) velocity ## u ## relative to its instantaneous rest frame. It continues to do so until it attains a velocity ## v ## relative to its initial rest frame. Prove that the ratio of the initial to the final rest mass of the rocket is given by
$$ \frac{m_{i}}{m_{f}} = \left( \frac{c+v}{c-v} \right) ^{\frac{c}{2u}} $$Attempt at a solution:
Consider, first, the instantaneous rest frame of the rocket at a given time.
The rocket ejects a small mass ## dm ## with backward velocity ## u ## and has an increase ##dv'## in its velocity. It's rest mass has a new value ## m' ##, which can be calculated by mass conservation law (considering that ## dv' ## is small and ##\gamma(dv') \approx 1##):
$$ m = dm \gamma(u) + m' \implies m' = m - dm \gamma(u)$$

Then, by conservation of mommentum, we have:
$$ 0 = -dmu + \left( m-dm \gamma(u) \right) dv' $$
Ignoring second order differentials, we have:
$$ dm u = m dv' $$

Now, we need to transform ##dv'## to the velocity measured by the inertial frame in which the rocket had velocity 0 when ##t=0## (lab frame).
Assume the rocket had velocity ## v ## at ## t = t_{1} ## and had an increase ## dv ## after ejecting material. Then, by relativistic velocity transformation (ignoring second order differentials):
$$ v + dv = \frac{ v + dv' } { 1+ \frac{vdv'}{c^{2}} } \implies dv' = \frac{1}{1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}} } dv $$

So we have:
$$ \frac{u}{m} dm = \frac{1}{1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}} } dv $$
$$ \int_{m_{i}}^{m_{f}} \frac{u}{m} dm = \int_{0}^{v} \frac{1}{1-\frac{(v')^{2}}{c^{2}} } dv' $$

Finally:
$$ \frac{m_{f}}{m_{i}} = \left| \frac{v+c}{v-c} \right| ^{\frac{c}{2u}} $$

Problem is, the left side should be ## \frac{m_{i}}{m_{f}} ##. The mistake is most likely on the first two equations, since the relation between the differetials shoud have a minus on one side (since velocity gets bigger when mass is released), but I can't find it. Can anyone help me?
 
on Phys.org
Your equations are inconsistent. To start off, it is not very illuminating to pick the mass of the ejecta to be ##dm## as this gives you the (false) impression that it is a change in ##m##. In fact, ##m## decreases if your selected ##dm## is positive, not the other way around. I suggest that you instead call the energy of the ejected material ##dE## and reserve ##dm## for a change in ##m## that is positive when ##m## increases and negative when it decreases. This is the only way you can connect ##dm## and ##m## in your integration. Otherwise you are not integrating with ##dm## actually being a differential in ##m##, it just seems that way because of your improper choice of variables. Your energy equation would then be
$$
m = dE + (m+dm)\gamma(dv').
$$
I leave it to you to linearise this for small ##dE##. Note that ##dm## will be negative when ##dE## is positive!

Note that with your chosen ##dm##, your momentum equation is wrong as well. The momentum of a mass ##dm## traveling at a speed ##u## is ##u\gamma(u) dm##.

Note: You do not actually need to know the mass of the ejecta. You can use that the momentum ##p## for an object is related to its energy ##E## via ##p = uE##, where ##u## is its speed. The result will then be valid for ##u = 1## as well as for ##u < 1##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Thales Castro
Orodruin said:
Your equations are inconsistent. To start off, it is not very illuminating to pick the mass of the ejecta to be ##dm## as this gives you the (false) impression that it is a change in ##m##. In fact, ##m## decreases if your selected ##dm## is positive, not the other way around. I suggest that you instead call the energy of the ejected material ##dE## and reserve ##dm## for a change in ##m## that is positive when ##m## increases and negative when it decreases. This is the only way you can connect ##dm## and ##m## in your integration. Otherwise you are not integrating with ##dm## actually being a differential in ##m##, it just seems that way because of your improper choice of variables. Your energy equation would then be
$$
m = dE + (m+dm)\gamma(dv').
$$
I leave it to you to linearise this for small ##dE##. Note that ##dm## will be negative when ##dE## is positive!

Note that with your chosen ##dm##, your momentum equation is wrong as well. The momentum of a mass ##dm## traveling at a speed ##u## is ##u\gamma(u) dm##.

Note: You do not actually need to know the mass of the ejecta. You can use that the momentum ##p## for an object is related to its energy ##E## via ##p = uE##, where ##u## is its speed. The result will then be valid for ##u = 1## as well as for ##u < 1##.

Thanks for replying.

So, from your equation, I have (Since my textbook doesn't assume ## c = 1 ## for this exercise, I'll just keep it there):

$$ mc^{2} = dE + (m+dm) \gamma(dv') c^{2} \implies dE = mc^{2} - (m+dm) \gamma (dv') c^{2} $$

Assuming ## p = \frac{u E}{c^{2}} ## and using conservation of mommentum, we have:

$$ 0 = -u \frac{ mc^{2} - (m+dm) \gamma (dv') c^{2} } {c^{2}} + (m+dm) \gamma(dv') dv' $$

Assuming ## \gamma(dv') \approx 1 ## and ignoring second order differentials:

$$ udm = -mdv' $$

I guess the velocity transformation and the integration are now analogous to what I did on my first attempt, so I'll just stop here.

The will give me the correct answer, but are there any other mistakes in what I did? I still don't feel very comfortable working with energy in relatvity.