Special Relativity - Rocket problem (particle mechanics)

Thales Castro
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Problem statement:
A rocket propels itself rectilinearly by giving portions of its mass a constant (backward) velocity ## u ## relative to its instantaneous rest frame. It continues to do so until it attains a velocity ## v ## relative to its initial rest frame. Prove that the ratio of the initial to the final rest mass of the rocket is given by
$$ \frac{m_{i}}{m_{f}} = \left( \frac{c+v}{c-v} \right) ^{\frac{c}{2u}} $$Attempt at a solution:
Consider, first, the instantaneous rest frame of the rocket at a given time.
The rocket ejects a small mass ## dm ## with backward velocity ## u ## and has an increase ##dv'## in its velocity. It's rest mass has a new value ## m' ##, which can be calculated by mass conservation law (considering that ## dv' ## is small and ##\gamma(dv') \approx 1##):
$$ m = dm \gamma(u) + m' \implies m' = m - dm \gamma(u)$$

Then, by conservation of mommentum, we have:
$$ 0 = -dmu + \left( m-dm \gamma(u) \right) dv' $$
Ignoring second order differentials, we have:
$$ dm u = m dv' $$

Now, we need to transform ##dv'## to the velocity measured by the inertial frame in which the rocket had velocity 0 when ##t=0## (lab frame).
Assume the rocket had velocity ## v ## at ## t = t_{1} ## and had an increase ## dv ## after ejecting material. Then, by relativistic velocity transformation (ignoring second order differentials):
$$ v + dv = \frac{ v + dv' } { 1+ \frac{vdv'}{c^{2}} } \implies dv' = \frac{1}{1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}} } dv $$

So we have:
$$ \frac{u}{m} dm = \frac{1}{1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}} } dv $$
$$ \int_{m_{i}}^{m_{f}} \frac{u}{m} dm = \int_{0}^{v} \frac{1}{1-\frac{(v')^{2}}{c^{2}} } dv' $$

Finally:
$$ \frac{m_{f}}{m_{i}} = \left| \frac{v+c}{v-c} \right| ^{\frac{c}{2u}} $$

Problem is, the left side should be ## \frac{m_{i}}{m_{f}} ##. The mistake is most likely on the first two equations, since the relation between the differetials shoud have a minus on one side (since velocity gets bigger when mass is released), but I can't find it. Can anyone help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equations are inconsistent. To start off, it is not very illuminating to pick the mass of the ejecta to be ##dm## as this gives you the (false) impression that it is a change in ##m##. In fact, ##m## decreases if your selected ##dm## is positive, not the other way around. I suggest that you instead call the energy of the ejected material ##dE## and reserve ##dm## for a change in ##m## that is positive when ##m## increases and negative when it decreases. This is the only way you can connect ##dm## and ##m## in your integration. Otherwise you are not integrating with ##dm## actually being a differential in ##m##, it just seems that way because of your improper choice of variables. Your energy equation would then be
$$
m = dE + (m+dm)\gamma(dv').
$$
I leave it to you to linearise this for small ##dE##. Note that ##dm## will be negative when ##dE## is positive!

Note that with your chosen ##dm##, your momentum equation is wrong as well. The momentum of a mass ##dm## traveling at a speed ##u## is ##u\gamma(u) dm##.

Note: You do not actually need to know the mass of the ejecta. You can use that the momentum ##p## for an object is related to its energy ##E## via ##p = uE##, where ##u## is its speed. The result will then be valid for ##u = 1## as well as for ##u < 1##.
 
  • Like
Likes Thales Castro
Orodruin said:
Your equations are inconsistent. To start off, it is not very illuminating to pick the mass of the ejecta to be ##dm## as this gives you the (false) impression that it is a change in ##m##. In fact, ##m## decreases if your selected ##dm## is positive, not the other way around. I suggest that you instead call the energy of the ejected material ##dE## and reserve ##dm## for a change in ##m## that is positive when ##m## increases and negative when it decreases. This is the only way you can connect ##dm## and ##m## in your integration. Otherwise you are not integrating with ##dm## actually being a differential in ##m##, it just seems that way because of your improper choice of variables. Your energy equation would then be
$$
m = dE + (m+dm)\gamma(dv').
$$
I leave it to you to linearise this for small ##dE##. Note that ##dm## will be negative when ##dE## is positive!

Note that with your chosen ##dm##, your momentum equation is wrong as well. The momentum of a mass ##dm## traveling at a speed ##u## is ##u\gamma(u) dm##.

Note: You do not actually need to know the mass of the ejecta. You can use that the momentum ##p## for an object is related to its energy ##E## via ##p = uE##, where ##u## is its speed. The result will then be valid for ##u = 1## as well as for ##u < 1##.

Thanks for replying.

So, from your equation, I have (Since my textbook doesn't assume ## c = 1 ## for this exercise, I'll just keep it there):

$$ mc^{2} = dE + (m+dm) \gamma(dv') c^{2} \implies dE = mc^{2} - (m+dm) \gamma (dv') c^{2} $$

Assuming ## p = \frac{u E}{c^{2}} ## and using conservation of mommentum, we have:

$$ 0 = -u \frac{ mc^{2} - (m+dm) \gamma (dv') c^{2} } {c^{2}} + (m+dm) \gamma(dv') dv' $$

Assuming ## \gamma(dv') \approx 1 ## and ignoring second order differentials:

$$ udm = -mdv' $$

I guess the velocity transformation and the integration are now analogous to what I did on my first attempt, so I'll just stop here.

The will give me the correct answer, but are there any other mistakes in what I did? I still don't feel very comfortable working with energy in relatvity.
 
Thales Castro said:
The will give me the correct answer, but are there any other mistakes in what I did?
Apart from the energy equation and the definition of ##dm## such that it is the actual change in the mass, the approach is correct.
 
  • Like
Likes Thales Castro

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K