Specific application of (E)-4-hexen-1-ol?

Thread starter Bibinou
Start date Nov 16, 2006
Tags

Application Specific

AI Thread Summary

(E)-4-hexen-1-ol, with CAS number 928-92-7, is a compound whose specific applications are not widely documented. Users are encouraged to utilize the CAS number to search for brand or proprietary names, which may yield more relevant information about its uses. The compound is known for its potential applications in the fragrance and flavor industries due to its green, grassy scent. Further exploration of scientific literature or industry databases may provide additional insights into its applications. Overall, detailed information on the practical uses of (E)-4-hexen-1-ol remains limited.

Nov 16, 2006

Bibinou

Hello,

do you know some specific application of (E)-4-hexen-1-ol?
I have already surch info. on google how to synthetise it but I didn't find what for this compound is really used.

thank you

Physics news on Phys.org

Nov 16, 2006

jim mcnamara

Mentor

If it has a CAS number - it should - use that to find "brand names" or proprietary names for it. That will speed your Google search.

Nov 17, 2006

Bibinou

yes of course it has a CAS number : 928-92-7

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...

View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

View full post »