Specific Heat Capacity of water

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The specific heat capacity of water is approximately 4.18 J/gK. When sediments and particulates, such as iron oxide, are present in water, they affect the specific heat capacity of the mixture. The heat capacity of iron oxide is significantly lower than that of water, leading to the conclusion that a mixture of water and iron oxide will have a lower specific heat capacity than pure water. This indicates that the presence of particulates may reduce the efficiency of heat transfer in the mixture.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of specific heat capacity and its measurement
  • Basic knowledge of thermal conductivity and heat transfer principles
  • Familiarity with the properties of water and common particulates like iron oxide
  • Experience with experimental design in thermal physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of particulates on thermal conductivity in liquids
  • Explore methods for measuring specific heat capacity in mixtures
  • Study the thermal properties of iron oxide and other common sediments
  • Investigate the role of molecular interactions in heat transfer in heterogeneous mixtures
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, chemistry, and environmental science, particularly those interested in thermal properties of liquids and the effects of impurities on heat transfer.

Ajaxx757
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The specific heat capacity of water is accepted to be roughly 4.18 J/gK. How would the specific heat value of a given water sample be effected when sediments and other forms of particulation, such as iron oxide from rust, are present? Would the mixture have a higher specific heat capacity value compared to pure water and thus require more energy to satisfy the same delta T?

Thoughts and any insight will be much appreciated.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Well, what would you think would happen?
 
The heat capacity of iron oxide is much lower than water. So, the heat capacity of the mixtures of water and iron oxide would be less than water alone.

chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ravi Singh choudhary
SteamKing said:
Well, what would you think would happen?

I would expect the dirty water to be a less efficient heat transfer medium and therefore have a higher specific heat. But, let's say I had 10g of pure water as sample A and 10g of dirty water (a mixture of sediments and iron oxides) as sample B, of that 10g the particulates account for .5g of the total weight. Sample A would have a SH of roughly 4.18 while sample B would have a SH value of 4.18 for 9.5g of the mixture and a value "c" for the .5g of particulates with c being less than the value of water. When I look at the situation this way I believe the dirty water would have a lower SH. However, I also wonder on a molecular level if the particulates which are in suspension, play a role in how heat is transferred through conduction. Meaning do they, the particulates, interfere with how well heat is transferred to the surrounding water.
 
Chestermiller said:
The heat capacity of iron oxide is much lower than water. So, the heat capacity of the mixtures of water and iron oxide would be less than water alone.

chet
Chet, see my second post above. Do you believe my thought process is correct? I guess I'm asking, is you're statement based of a similar thought process of mine? And what would you have to say about my last portion with the particulates being in suspension and perhaps effecting how well heat is transferred to the mixture through conduction?
 
The specific heat capacity of water will probably have been measured using a rig that stirs the water to eliminate any error due to conduction. In any case good thermal conductivity just helps ensure uniform temperature. It doesn't/wouldn't change the energy required to raise the temperature.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
17K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K