Spectroscopic linelist question

  • Thread starter Thread starter jl29488
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Computing a molecular linelist for PH is essential because experimental measurements may not capture the complexity of all transitions involved. Modeling helps verify the physics used by comparing computational results with experimental observations. Exact solutions for complex molecules are unattainable, necessitating approximations in modeling. Understanding the purpose of the project and consulting with a supervisor can clarify the need for computational approaches. Ultimately, computational modeling is a critical tool in molecular spectroscopy.
jl29488
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm currrently doing a project on computing a molecular linelist (set of transitions) for a range of temperatures. I'm wondering though why hey need to be computed.. i.e why can you not measure the transitions in a lab. My molecule I'm looking at is called PH. Why do I need to model the spectra of this molecule computationally instead of experimentally? Is it because of the number of transitions that are involved?

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jl29488 said:
Hi,

I'm currrently doing a project on computing a molecular linelist (set of transitions) for a range of temperatures. I'm wondering though why hey need to be computed.. i.e why can you not measure the transitions in a lab. My molecule I'm looking at is called PH. Why do I need to model the spectra of this molecule computationally instead of experimentally? Is it because of the number of transitions that are involved?

Cheers

You need to back up a bit here. Why are you doing this project? Doesn't the project have an overall description and purpose? Have you asked the person who is supervising your work?

There are many different reasons to do such modelling. The most obvious would be to see if the physics that is used will produce results that matches experimental observation. If they do, then you know that the model is correct to some extent. This is one way we can verify the physics and approximation that we use.

Complex atoms and molecules can't be solved exactly. There are no exact, closed-formed solutions to atoms heavier than helium. So in many cases, we have to make approximations to model atoms and molecules, and we have to know how exact these are. So the only way we can do this is to produce a model, check the outcome, and then compare with experiment.

It is ALWAYS a good idea to get a general purpose and reason why you are doing something. And the person who is in charge of this should be the person who holds such answer.

Zz.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
35
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top