How Does Water Slow Down Light Without Violating Special Relativity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jake
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sr
Jake
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
Basic SR question here. But Einstein said that the Speed of light is an absolute constant. Why then do we hear of experiments of laser light and some kind of substance used to SLOW light down to some ridiculously slow speeds? And how water slows down light too. Isn't that "violating" SR? If the Speed of Light is constant, then how can SR mean anything when something as simple as water can slow down light?

I'm sure there's a perfect explanation, I just don't know it :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Great question! The key to understanding this apparent contradiction is to remember that while the speed of light is an absolute constant in a vacuum, it can be affected by the medium through which it is traveling. In other words, the speed of light is not constant in all materials. This is known as the refractive index of a material, and it is a fundamental property of light.

In the case of laser light, the experiments you mentioned are typically done using substances such as glass or water, which have a higher refractive index than air. This means that light traveling through these materials will be slowed down, as it interacts with the atoms and molecules in the substance. This is not a violation of special relativity, as the speed of light in a vacuum is still the same and remains a constant in all reference frames.

As for water, it is a well-known fact that light travels slower in water than in air. This is due to the higher refractive index of water, as well as its density and other properties. Again, this does not contradict special relativity as the speed of light in a vacuum is still the same and remains the ultimate limit for the speed of anything in the universe.

In fact, the concept of the refractive index is actually incorporated into special relativity, as it is necessary for understanding the behavior of light in different materials and reference frames. So while it may seem counterintuitive that something as simple as water can slow down light, it is actually a fundamental aspect of how light behaves in our world.

I hope this helps clear up any confusion and shows that special relativity is still a valid and accurate theory, even in the face of seemingly contradictory observations.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top