Speed of light is set to be 299,792,458 m/s

AI Thread Summary
The speed of light is universally measured at 299,792,458 m/s, regardless of the observer's frame of reference. As one approaches this speed, time dilation occurs for external observers, but the individual experiences time normally. This means that all observers, regardless of their relative speeds, will measure the speed of light as constant. The concept of time being relative is central to understanding these measurements, as each observer perceives time differently based on their motion. Thus, the laws of physics remain consistent across all inertial frames, reinforcing the constancy of light's speed.
MaoIragorri
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have a question...
The speed of light is set to be 299,792,458 m/s
but if time slows as you approach the speed of light,
how can we tell how fast Light itself is actually traveling?
 
Science news on Phys.org


MaoIragorri said:
I have a question...
The speed of light is set to be 299,792,458 m/s
but if time slows as you approach the speed of light,
how can we tell how fast Light itself is actually traveling?

As you approach c relative to some external reference frame, you do not experience a time dilation, you experience time passing normally. But the observers in that external reference frame experience your time as increasingly attenuated.


All observers - on the spaceship and off it regardless of their speed with respect to each other - will measure the speed of light as 299,792,458 m/s.

There are many searchable posts on this forum that go into it in more detail.
 


Length also contracts when approaching the speed of light. Relativistically speaking, the speed of light is constant in all reference frames; measurement of it shouldn't change from one frame to another.
 


yeah, but the are all external references...
if time starts to slow down around you, then a second becomes elongated...
to people around you the second might remain a second, but if to you the second becomes, let's say an hour... how fast are you moving per second.

does this make sense?
 


MaoIragorri said:
does this make sense?
No.

The first postulate of Special Relativity is that the laws of the universe are the same for any inertial (non accelerating) observer. What this means here is that there is no experiment you can perform to distinguish an absolute motion. You may be stationary with respect to one outside observer, moving at 1,000 mph with respect to another and moving at 10,000 mph with respect to another. And all 3 of these observers (and you) can consider themself stationary and measure the speed of light to be C in their frame.

Don't say "if time starts to slow down around you" - that's nonsensical. You never see any change in your clock, but your clock runs at one rate for you, another rate with respect to the clock of that guy moving at 1,000 mph and yet another rate wrt the guy moving at 10,000 mph. Time isn't variable, it is relative.
 


Briliant, thanks all.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Back
Top