Speed of Objects Falling to Black Hole Center

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the behavior of objects falling into a black hole, specifically regarding their speed as they approach the center. It is established that once objects cross the event horizon, the conventional concept of "speed" relative to a hovering observer becomes meaningless. However, prior to crossing the horizon, overtaking is possible if the second object's initial speed is sufficiently high and the time interval between launches is short. The gravitational effects lead to a scenario where acceleration varies with distance, contradicting the notion of constant acceleration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of black hole physics and event horizons
  • Familiarity with general relativity concepts
  • Knowledge of gravitational acceleration and its variation with distance
  • Basic principles of speed measurement in relativistic contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of general relativity on black hole dynamics
  • Study the concept of spacetime curvature and its effects on motion
  • Learn about the behavior of light and objects near the event horizon
  • Explore the mathematical framework of black hole thermodynamics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and students of astrophysics interested in the dynamics of black holes and the effects of gravity on objects approaching extreme gravitational fields.

jBase
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I was wondering what is known about the speed of objects falling to the centre of a Black Hole?
If a number of identical objects, initially located outside the event horizon, were propelled at varying speeds towards a black hole, would that variability be maintained as they pass through the horizon and all the way to the centre, or would they all approach some limiting speed?
Inside the event horizon, could an object overtake another if it's initial speed was higher, yet because they were propelled at different times, it passed through the horizon after the other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
StanEvans said:
I am no expert but I would think that the effect of gravity from the black hole would be constant acceleration, or close to constant.
Most definitely not. This isn't even true in Newtonian gravity - acceleration varies with distance.

I don't know whether it's possible to overtake inside an event horizon. Probably, since spacetime must be locally flat even inside a black hole. But I'll let more knowledgeable folk answer that one.
 
jBase said:
If a number of identical objects, initially located outside the event horizon, were propelled at varying speeds towards a black hole, would that variability be maintained as they pass through the horizon and all the way to the centre

This question can't be answered as you ask it, because the concept of "speed" you are using no longer works inside the horizon. You are defining "speed", as far as I can tell, as "speed relative to an observer who is hovering at a constant altitude". But below the horizon, it is impossible for any observer to hover at a constant altitude. So "speed" defined this way doesn't make sense inside the horizon.

jBase said:
Inside the event horizon, could an object overtake another if it's initial speed was higher, yet because they were propelled at different times, it passed through the horizon after the other?

This question, however, can be answered, since both objects are launched from outside the horizon, where "initial speed" makes sense (we can just measure it relative to an observer hovering at the altitude from which both objects are launched). The answer is that overtaking is possible, if the second object's initial speed is fast enough compared to the first, and the time between launches (as measured by the hovering observer) is short enough. But there will be a limiting time between launches, after which, no matter how fast you launch the second object, it can't possibly overtake the first--even if the second "object" is actually a light ray (which is the fastest possible thing you could launch).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
6K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K