adjacent said:
Your second diagram is not clear. Distance in what?
How about betting on mm ?
But poor Des is still looking at the wrong frequency. He may be confused by the label on the x-axis of graph a.
Des: you see there one full period ends at the number 40. that is the period divided by ms.
Meaning: ##{period \over ms} = 40\, ## so that period = ??
What is the dimension of frequency ?
- - - -
Graph b x-axis label is distance / mm but there he has no problem extracting ##\lambda## = 4 mm.
Des: Now, do you see where you ended up upside down ?
- - - -
Personally I think the labels are quite correct, but in my own work I use labels like "Displacement in cm" and "Time in ms" that (I hope) are less confusing than the correct labels.
(But then, I am not a teacher / pedagogics expert. Any opinions/experience from the field?)
[edit] woke up after some soccer. Des is happy. My opinions question stands.