Speed/Velocity and Volume Flow Rate of Viscous Fluids

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed and volume flow rate (VFR) of viscous fluids in different sections of a pipe. The initial calculations used the formula VFR = Av, leading to confusion when trying to apply the same velocity across different sections. Participants emphasized the importance of the continuity equation, stating that the total VFR remains constant across sections, while individual velocities may differ. There was also mention of the Hagen-Poiseuille equation, which relates viscosity to flow rate, indicating that viscosity does not directly correlate with increased flow. The need for a diagram was highlighted to clarify the problem further.
Ophi-Siren-Kit
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A viscous fluid with viscosity η = 1.7 × 10^-3 Pa s is flowing horizontally in the pipe shown below. Section 1, 2, and 3 have radii of r1 = 10.0 cm, r2 = 8.0 cm, and r3 = 6.0 cm, respectively. All sections have the same length L = 8.1 m. The volume flow rate of the fluid in Section 1 is F1 = 0.063 m^3/s. The pressure differences across Section 2 and Section 3 are both 41 PA because these two split sections are parallel, just as in the DC circuit.

{I am given a diagram with a single pipe splitting into two pipes, flow arrows all pointed to the right, with the L sections being the flat horizontal areas, L sections not including the distance.}

(a) What is the speed of the fluid in Section 1?
(b) What is the volume flow rate in Section 2?
(c) What is the speed of the fluid in Section 2?
(d) What is the speed of the fluid in Section 3?
Relevant Equations
Volume Flow Rate(VFR) = Cross-sectional Area multiplied by Velocity (A*v)
[VFR=Av]

and/or

Volume Flow Rate = viscosity (η) times velocity (v) times cross-sectional area (A) all divided by length (L)
[VFR=ηvA/L]

Continuity Equation: A1V1=A2V2
where one area times velocity equaled another area times velocity
In my first attempt, I started off converting the radii of all three sections from centimeters (10, 8, 6) to meters (0.10 , 0.08 , 0.06), then used the VFR=Av formula to find the speed/velocity of section one.

VFR== 0.063 m^3/s
A== pi*r^2=pi*(10cm)^2=pi*(0.10)^2=pi*0.01 == 0.031415927
VFR/A=v ==2.005352283...

Where my attempts began to change was for the second (b) question. I originally went for just plugging the velocity found in question one with a different area, then moving on to question b -- but then trying to reverse-engineer to get question c, I just got the velocity I borrowed earlier.

VFR=(pi*(0.08)^2)v
v=2.005352283...
VFR=0.04032
{then reversed for the same thing due to using the same velocity as question a}

This pinged as a mental red flag for me, and so I went to the internet to search. While searching for possible other ways to solve for this, I was reminded of the continuity equation. So, using that to answer the second question by saying the volume flow rate for section 1 was equal to the VFR for section 2, I then moved to question 3 by saying the following:

VFR == 0.063 m^3/s
A==(pi*0.08^2)=(pi*0.0064)=0.020106193...
VFR/A=v == 3.133362942121689...

I tried, after getting both attempts at a third question (c) answer, to figure out if I needed continuity or something else for question 4, but I'm honestly stuck.

I tried to get a tutor to help me confirm if I did this right, and they gave me the second VFR equation to redo the first question with. The velocity number for the redo was 3001.764705882353, and with that being such a large number, I felt like it couldn't be correct.

I'm not sure if I was ever on the right track, or if all of these attempts are wrong. Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you post an image of the diagram? That would help.
If VFR = Av, you can't then say VFR = ηvA/L. That would require viscosity to have the same dimensions as length, which it doesn't. (It also implies that flow rate is greater the higher the viscosity, which is counter-intuitive. Look up the Poiseuille equation.)
You can't assume that either the velocity or the VFR are the same between sections 1 and 2. What is true is that the total VFR for sections 2 and 3 is the same as that for section 1.
 
mjc123 said:
Can you post an image of the diagram? That would help.
If VFR = Av, you can't then say VFR = ηvA/L. That would require viscosity to have the same dimensions as length, which it doesn't. (It also implies that flow rate is greater the higher the viscosity, which is counter-intuitive. Look up the Poiseuille equation.)
You can't assume that either the velocity or the VFR are the same between sections 1 and 2. What is true is that the total VFR for sections 2 and 3 is the same as that for section 1.
1635892817772.png

Here's the picture!
 
Did you look up the Hagen-Poiseuille equation yet?
 
Chestermiller said:
Did you look up the Hagen-Poiseuille equation yet?
I know of the Poiseuille equation, but I don't know if I'm supposed to use it here. I had a fifth question included in the problem where I used the equation to find pressure difference. I didn't include it because I figured out how to do it on my own.
 
Ophi-Siren-Kit said:
I know of the Poiseuille equation, but I don't know if I'm supposed to use it here. I had a fifth question included in the problem where I used the equation to find pressure difference. I didn't include it because I figured out how to do it on my own.
Oh really? I'd be interested in seeing your solution.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top