Spherical magnet dropped through aluminum pole rotates?

AI Thread Summary
Dropping a spherical magnet through an aluminum pole induces currents that significantly slow its descent, as explained by Lenz's law. The discussion revolves around whether the magnet will rotate to align its poles vertically or horizontally during its fall. Some participants suggest that the induced magnetic field from the aluminum may cause the magnet to rotate horizontally, as the repulsion from the field ahead could outweigh the attraction from the field behind. The resistivity of aluminum is also considered, as it may influence the behavior of the induced currents and the resulting magnetic interactions. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards the idea that the magnet's orientation could change to maximize the slowing effect on both poles.
Erwin Derek
Lenz's law shows that dropping a magnet through an aluminum pole will cause an induced current that slows down its fall drastically.

I found a website that talks about this a little: https://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/TTT-slowfall/slowfall.htm

It has the following question:

Obtain such a spherical magnet that is slightly smaller than the inside diameter of the tube. The sphere will fall slowly down the tube just as the cylinder did. Mark the magnet "poles" with small colored stickers. Now watch the sphere from above as it falls down the tube. Does the sphere always rotate and re-orient so that one of the poles is up, and the other down? Or does it re-orient with the magnetic axis horizontal? Why?

I don't see any reason why the sphere would rotate. I think the net force exerted by all the induced currents should just point directly up regardless of what orientation the magnet is dropped. Can anyone explain if the sphere would rotate to have its poles vertical or horizontal, and why would it do this?

I am guessing it may have to do with the resistivity of aluminum or something...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The induced current in the aluminum creates a magnetic field that is opposite the direction of the field from the magnet. If the + pole is towards the direction of travel, the field that gets created just ahead of it will point towards the + pole and thereby repel it. A similar repulsion occurs if the - pole is towards the direction of travel. This should give a clue as to what you might expect to see.
 
Charles Link said:
The induced current in the aluminum creates a magnetic field that is opposite the direction of the field from the magnet. If the + pole is towards the direction of travel, the field that gets created just ahead of it will point towards the + pole and thereby repel it. This should give a clue as to what you might expect to see.

How about the field just before it? Wouldn't that field attract the upper pole just as much as the ahead field repels the lower pole?

If the field ahead of the magnet comes faster, maybe due to the resistivity of aluminum, then perhaps its repulsion would be a bit more than the attraction of the upper field? By this logic the ball might rotate so that its poles are horizontal... what do you think?
 
Erwin Derek said:
How about the field just before it? Wouldn't that field attract the upper pole just as much as the ahead field repels the lower pole?

If the field ahead of the magnet comes faster, maybe due to the resistivity of aluminum, then perhaps its repulsion would be a bit more than the attraction of the upper field? By this logic the ball might rotate so that its poles are horizontal... what do you think?
I think you are correct in that the upper pole experiences a pull on it to slow it down. Just a guess is that the slowing effect might get maximized for both poles when the magnet is horizontal, but it's just a guess.(Editing: I just read your second line=yes I think I agree with you, but I'm not 100% sure.) The region ahead will slow the pole and the region behind it will also pull on it to slow it, regardless of the polarity. ## \\ ## Additional editing: Also the magnetic field is strongest right at the surface near the axis of the poles, and this would have the most effect on the aluminum in the horizontal direction, inducing larger currents.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top