Spin 1/2 Basis Change Homework Solution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the unitary operator U that transforms the spin operator Sn for a spin 1/2 particle along an arbitrary axis n into Sz. The user initially derived U but failed to recover Sz after applying it to Sn. They later realized that U must be orthogonal, leading to the conclusion that the azimuthal angle φ should be zero for orthogonality to the z-axis. However, other participants clarified that φ can take any value, and the correct form of U should include the eigenvectors of Sn as its columns. Ultimately, the user was guided to verify that their matrix U is unitary and correctly diagonalizes Sn without the restriction of φ being zero.
beebopbellopu
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is from my first-quarter graduate QM course. Part 4 of this problem asks me to compute the unitary operator U which transforms Sn into Sz, where Sn is the spin operator for spin 1/2 quantized along some arbitrary axis n = icos\phisinθ + jsin\phisinθ + zcosθ.

Homework Equations



From part 1, I solved Sn = \begin{pmatrix} cosθ&sinθe-i\phi\\ sinθei\phi&-cosθ \end{pmatrix}

|n;+> = cos(θ/2)|+> + sin(θ/2)ei\phi|->
|n;-> = sin(θ/2)|+> - cos(θ/2)ei\phi|->

where |+> and |-> are the spin up and down states along the z-axis

Also: U(adjoint)SnU = Sz

The Attempt at a Solution



U = Ʃ|n;±><±| = |n;+><+| + |n;-><-| = [cos(θ/2)|+> + sin(θ/2)ei\phi|->]<+| + [sin(θ/2)|+> - cos(θ/2)ei\phi|->]<-|

I then calculated out <+|U|+>, <-|U|+>, <+|U|->, and <-|U|-> to get the 4 elements of the unitary operator matrix, and end up with:

U = \begin{pmatrix}cos(θ/2)&sin(θ/2)ei\phi\\sin(θ/2)&-cos(θ/2)ei\phi\end{pmatrix}

However I used that to transform Sn and could not recover Sz. U(adjoint) is just the transpose complex conjugate so then I should be using:

U(adjoint) = \begin{pmatrix}cos(θ/2)&sin(θ/2)\\sin(θ/2)e-i\phi&-cos(θ/2)e-i\phi\end{pmatrix}

I'm not quite sure where to go from here.

Edit: I also can't figure out how to post matrices, if someone can help with that also. Thanks!

Edit 2: Thanks vela for the fix.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Fixed your LaTeX.
beebopbellopu said:

Homework Statement



This is from my first-quarter graduate QM course. Part 4 of this problem asks me to compute the unitary operator U which transforms Sn into Sz, where Sn is the spin operator for spin 1/2 quantized along some arbitrary axis n = icos\phisinθ + jsin\phisinθ + zcosθ


Homework Equations



From part 1, I solved Sn = \begin{pmatrix} \cos\theta &amp; e^{-i\phi}\sin\theta \\ e^{i\phi} \sin \theta &amp; -\cosθ \end{pmatrix}


|n;+> = cos(θ/2)|+> + sin(θ/2)ei\phi|->
|n;-> = sin(θ/2)|+> - cos(θ/2)ei\phi|->

where |+> and |-> are the spin up and down states along the z-axis.

Also: U(adjoint)SnU = Sz

The Attempt at a Solution



U = Ʃ|n;±><±| = |n;+><+| + |n;-><-| = [cos(θ/2)|+> + sin(θ/2)ei\phi|->]<+| + [sin(θ/2)|+> - cos(θ/2)ei\phi|->]<-|

I then calculated out <+|U|+>, <-|U|+>, <+|U|->, and <-|U|-> to get the 4 elements of the unitary operator matrix, and end up with:
U = \begin{pmatrix} \cos(\theta/2) &amp; e^{i\phi}\sin(\theta/2) \\ \sin(\theta/2) &amp; -e^{i\phi}cos(θ/2)\end{pmatrix}

However I used that to transform Sn and could not recover Sz. U(adjoint) is just the transpose complex conjugate so then I should be using:

U^\dagger = \begin{pmatrix} \cos(\theta/2) &amp; \sin(\theta/2) \\ e^{-i\phi}\sin(\theta/2) &amp; -e^{-i\phi}cos(\theta/2)\end{pmatrix}

I'm not quite sure where to go from here.

Edit: I also can't figure out how to post matrices, if someone can help with that also. Thanks!
 
Okay so I did out the matrix math a little further, found some more double angle identities and so forth, and if I set \phi to 0 after multiplying through it comes out to σ3 which is what I want for Sz.

I think that this is because the unitary operator has to keep the inner product and its therefore an orthogonal transformation, meaning U must be orthogonal. If that's the case then it has to have real elements and the only way for that is if phi = 0, which makes sense in that the the azimuthal angle needs to be 0 in order to be orthogonal to the z-axis.

Is that correct?
 
Your matrix for Sn is missing an overall factor of 1/2.

If you multiply the second eigenvector by e-iΦ, you'll have
\begin{align*}
\vert + \rangle_n &= \begin{pmatrix} \cos(\theta/2) \\ e^{i\phi}\sin(\theta/2) \end{pmatrix} \\
\vert - \rangle_n &= \begin{pmatrix} e^{-i\phi}\sin(\theta/2) \\ -\cos(\theta/2)\end{pmatrix}
\end{align*}(It's not really necessary to do this. I'm just doing it for aesthetic reasons.)

If you recall your basic linear algebra, you know that the matrix U that diagonalizes Sn has the eigenvectors of Sn as its columns, so you haveU=\begin{pmatrix} <br /> \cos(\theta/2) &amp; e^{-i\phi}\sin(\theta/2) \\ <br /> e^{i\phi}\sin(\theta/2) &amp; -\cos(\theta/2)<br /> \end{pmatrix}
You can verify that this matrix is in fact unitary for any value of the angles and that it will diagonalize Sn. Requiring Φ=0 isn't acceptable since n can point in any direction.

For some reason, you ended up with the transpose of this matrix.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top