Spin 1/2 - Is √3/2ħ or √¾ħ Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Isaac0427
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spin Spin 1/2
Isaac0427
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
718
Reaction score
163
Hi,
I was looking at the wikipedia article for spin 1/2 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin-½ and it stated that √(½(½+1))ħ=√3/2ħ. According to my math it is √¾ħ. Is this just a typo or am I missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Be careful, what you wrote is ## \sqrt{\frac 3 4 }\hbar ## and what the wiki page wrote is ## \frac{\sqrt 3}{2} \hbar ##. They're the same!
 
  • Like
Likes Isaac0427
Shyan said:
Be careful, what you wrote is ## \sqrt{\frac 3 4 }\hbar ## and what the wiki page wrote is ## \frac{\sqrt 3}{2} \hbar ##. They're the same!
Ah I see. I went off initial simplification, not realizing that they are the same.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top