Spin-1 Propagator and polarization vectors

TriTertButoxy
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
Hi. I am stuck.
By inverting the spin-1 differential operator I was able to derive (quite easily) the propagator for the spin-1 field (in a spontaneously broken gauge theory) in the R_\xi gauges for the arbitrary gauge parameter \xi. The result is
<br /> \tilde{D}^{\mu\nu}(p)=\frac{-i}{p^2-m^2+i\epsilon}\left(g^{\mu\nu}-(1-\xi)\frac{p^\mu p^\nu}{p^2-\xi m^2+i\epsilon}\right).<br />
But now, when I try to calculate the two-point correlator using the mode expansion for the spin-1 field, I can't quite get the same answer.
<br /> \langle 0|T(\hat{A}_\mu(x)\hat{A}_\nu(y))|0\rangle=\int \frac{d^4p}{(2\pi)^4}\frac{ie^{-i p.(x-y)}}{p^2-m^2+i\epsilon}\left(\epsilon_\mu^{[0]}(\mathbf{p})\epsilon_\nu^{*[0]}(\mathbf{p})-\sum_{\lambda=1,2,3}\epsilon_\mu^{[\lambda]}(\mathbf{p})\epsilon_\nu^{*[\lambda]}(\mathbf{p})\right)<br />
I need to do a polarization sum, but can't quite figure out how to get the gauge-dependence in there. What are the polarization vectors? and how do I derive them?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok. I found the answer in Greiner, Field Quantization 1996, chapter 7. The answer is very long, and I do not expect anyone to answer. Thanks to those who have thought about this problem.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top