Spin a dial that has a pointer to n regions

  • Thread starter Thread starter lizarton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spin
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the probability that the sum of three spins on a dial, which can point to n equally likely regions, equals n. The total number of outcomes for three spins is n^3. Participants explore the number of favorable outcomes using ordered triples and compositions, leading to the conclusion that the number of ways to achieve a sum of n can be expressed using binomial coefficients. The probability is ultimately framed as the ratio of favorable outcomes to total outcomes, yielding a formula involving factorials and combinations. Clarifications on the distinction between compositions and combinations are also addressed, emphasizing the importance of understanding these concepts in solving the problem.
lizarton
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Consider a dial having a pointer that is equally likely to point to each of n region numbered 1,2,...,n. When we spin the dial three times, what is the probability that the sum of the selected numbers is n?

I have to use summations, and I'm sure binomial coefficients. I believe that this is a selection; it seems to imitate rolling an n-sided die three times, but I even have trouble computing that problem.

The total number of outcomes is n^3 (I think)

I started counting ordered triples of some n terms...

n=3: There is only one way, {(1,1,1)}
n=4: There are 3 ways, {(1,2,1),(1,1,2),(2,1,1)}
n=5: There are 6 ways, {(1,1,3),(1,2,2),(1,3,1),(2,1,2,),(2,2,1),(3,1,1)}
n=6: There are 10 ways...
n=7: 15 ways...

For arbitrary n, you can start making ordered triples...
(1,1,n-2)<br /> (1,2,n-3)<br /> (1,3,n-4)<br /> \ldots<br /> (1,n-2,1)<br /> (1,n-3,2)<br /> \ldots<br />

A Theorem I believe is relevant:
With repetition allowed, there are \left(\stackrel{n+k-1}{k - 1}\right) ways to select n objects from k types. This also equals the number of nonnegative integer solutions to x_{1} + \ldots + x_{k} = n.

My problem is identifying n and k in these problems. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I understand you, you want to know the probability of getting a sum = n for in k tries where n is a positive integer and the regions are the natural numbers: 1, 2, 3, ...n. This involves compositions of integers which you demonstrated. The formula for the number of compositions for any natural number n is 2 ^ {n-1}. Since you are only interested in the compositions of three integers (k=3) and are not including zero, the formula is (n-1)!/(k-1)!(n-k)!

How would you use this information to find the probability for n=9, k=3?
 
Last edited:
Thanks for replying!
Are compositions the same as selections in this context? If so, here's my attempt, provided I understand you correctly:

For n = 9 and k = 3, the total number of compositions would be 2^{8}.

Then the number of favorable outcomes/compositions would be \frac{8!}{2!6!}.

So the probability that the sum of the regions equals 9 is \frac{8*7}{2^{9}}.

So then, to answer the question in general for arbitrary n, the probability is

\frac{(n-1)!}{2^{n}(n-3)!} = \frac{1}{2^{n}(n-3)(n-2)}?
 
lizarton said:
Thanks for replying!

So then, to answer the question in general for arbitrary n, the probability is

\frac{(n-1)!}{2^{n}(n-3)!} = \frac{1}{2^{n}(n-3)(n-2)}?

Think about it. The probability is a fraction. Both the numerator and denominator is (n-1)!/(k-1)!(n-k)!. What are n and k for the numerator and denominator respectively?
 
For the denominator, we would have n=k, right? The formula I wrote for arbitrary n has been simplified; (3-1)!=2, and I divided the entire quantity by 2^{n-1}. I'm not sure that I understand the relationship we draw here between 2^{n-1} and \frac{(n-1)!}{(k-1)!(n-k)!}. Was my estimate for n=9, k=3 correct?
 
lizarton said:
For the denominator, we would have n=k, right? The formula I wrote for arbitrary n has been simplified; (3-1)!=2, and I divided the entire quantity by 2^{n-1}. I'm not sure that I understand the relationship we draw here between 2^{n-1} and \frac{(n-1)!}{(k-1)!(n-k)!}. Was my estimate for n=9, k=3 correct?

If I understand your problem correctly, you spin the dial just 3 times and it can stop at any number 1-9. Your question is the probability that the sum of three spins will be exactly 9. However, it's possible the dial can stop, for example, at 9 three times, no?
 
The dial can stop at any arbitrary natural number 1..n. The number of regions isn't specified further than that, but there are k=3 trials that we consider. The problem asks to compute the probability that the sum of the three spins will equal n. However, your version of the problem is just a simpler case of the general problem I need to solve, I believe.
 
lizarton said:
The dial can stop at any arbitrary natural number 1..n. The number of regions isn't specified further than that, but there are k=3 trials that we consider. The problem asks to compute the probability that the sum of the three spins will equal n. However, your version of the problem is just a simpler case of the general problem I need to solve, I believe.

Well then, I'm not sure what you're trying to do. Just say n instead of 9. The dial can still stop at n three times, no? How do you account for sums larger than n? If I understand you, you can have sums up to n*k.
 
Yes, the largest possible sum would be 3n.

Using my formula above, the number of ways that the 3 trials can add up to n is \left(\stackrel{n+3-1}{3 - 1}\right) = \left(\stackrel{n + 2}{2}\right)

Does that seem right to you? Since I'm looking for the number of nonnegative integer solutions to x_{1} + x_{2} + ... + x_{k} = n, where the number of trials is k = 3.

Then the total number of outcomes is n^{k} by the product rule.

This gives the probability as
\frac{\left(\stackrel{n + 2}{2}\right)}{n^{3}}.

Does this look correct to you?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
lizarton said:
Yes, the largest possible sum would be 3n.

Using my formula above, the number of ways that the 3 trials can add up to n is \left(\stackrel{n+3-1}{3 - 1}\right) = \left(\stackrel{n + 2}{2}\right)

Does that seem right to you? Since I'm looking for the number of nonnegative integer solutions to x_{1} + x_{2} + ... + x_{k} = n, where the number of trials is k = 3.

Then the total number of outcomes is n^{k} by the product rule.

This gives the probability as
\frac{\left(\stackrel{n + 2}{2}\right)}{n^{k}}.

Does this look correct to you?

No. Your problem is to find the number of compositions of length k for n and for kn. The probability then becomes the fraction of the former over the latter. The proper formula for the number of compositions of length k for n is the factorial one I gave you. I suggest you look up compositions and verify this formula for yourself before you respond.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
I looked up compositions, and after some research I think you may have meant to say that we seek combinations, the number of ways of picking k unordered outcomes from n possibilities. I have not dealt with either of these terms in my class, so I apologize for not recognizing them off-hand.

If my reckoning of the number of ways this can happen (all the way at the top) is correct with n=3,4,5,6,7, then the coefficient that will give me the number of ways this can happen for arbitrary n is \left(\stackrel{n-1}{2}\right) = \frac{1}{2} (n-2)(n-1).

The probability is this quantity divided by the total number of outcomes.

Thanks for your help.
 
Back
Top