Spin and orbital magnetic moments?

pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1
The books said that total magnetic moment of an electron is spin + orbital magnetic moment.

But is the orbital magnetic moment realistic quantum mechanically? I thought electrons dosen't have a trajectory. The Stern Garlach experiment showed that silver atoms only split into two paths after being in a magnetic field. But if orbital magnetic moment was also present then shouldn't there be less distinction in that the paths may have been more spread out or random.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The net orbital angular momentum of the 47 electrons in a silver atom is zero, and their spins "pair up" so the total angular momentum (orbital + spin) comes only from the spin of the outermost electron.
 
pivoxa15 said:
The books said that total magnetic moment of an electron is spin + orbital magnetic moment.

But is the orbital magnetic moment realistic quantum mechanically? I thought electrons dosen't have a trajectory. The Stern Garlach experiment showed that silver atoms only split into two paths after being in a magnetic field. But if orbital magnetic moment was also present then shouldn't there be less distinction in that the paths may have been more spread out or random.
Orbital angular momentum is also quantized. If an atom has both S and L, then J=L+S. (QM addition. This is called "L-S coupling".)
J is quantized and would determine the SG splitting.
 
The angular momentum of an electron is also quantised and a real phenomena in that it can be measured (although only one component at a time). Classically moving charges generate a magnetic field so that is why we associate an orbital magnetic moment to an electron in an atom. But the angular momentum is quantised and that is why the magnetic moment is also quantised.
 
pivoxa15 said:
The books said that total magnetic moment of an electron is spin + orbital magnetic moment.

But is the orbital magnetic moment realistic quantum mechanically? I thought electrons dosen't have a trajectory. The Stern Garlach experiment showed that silver atoms only split into two paths after being in a magnetic field. But if orbital magnetic moment was also present then shouldn't there be less distinction in that the paths may have been more spread out or random.

Well, since it's given by

\hat{\mu}_{orb} \sim \hat{\vec{L}}\cdot \vec{B},

i'd say it's pretty realistic...

Daniel.

P.S. For l\neq 0 stationary states of the H-atom it gives a contribution to the shifting of the normal energy levels.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top