Understanding Spin States in Quantum Mechanics

  • Thread starter Thread starter KFC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction Spin
KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4
If we choose the z direction as the orientation of the spin, then spin-up (|+>) and spin-down (|->) could be written as

|+\rangle = \left(\begin{matrix}1 \\ 0\end{matrix}\right)
|-\rangle = \left(\begin{matrix}0 \\ 1\end{matrix}\right)

From the textbook, if we consider aabritary orientation (n), the new state will be given

|+_n\rangle = \left(\begin{matrix}\cos(\theta/2) e^{-i\phi/2} \\ \sin(\theta/2) e^{i\phi/2}\end{matrix}\right)

|-_n\rangle = \left(\begin{matrix}-\sin(\theta/2) e^{-i\phi/2} \\ \cos(\theta/2) e^{i\phi/2}\end{matrix}\right)

Now, consider the orientation along y direction such that \theta=\pi/2, \phi=\pi/2, it will gives the spin-up and spin-down along y direction. However, in some other textbooks, the spin-up/down along y direction is


|\pm_y\rangle = \dfrac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\left(\begin{matrix}1 \\ \pm i\end{matrix}\right)

But I cannot get this state if I start from \theta=\pi/2, \phi=\pi/2 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How are the angles defined?
 
Sorry! I found what's going on now. Since the phase factor doesn't matter in QM, hence, it gives the same state by pulling the phase factor out. Sorry for bothering.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top