Sports question. Team Race to 6 points chances

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the probabilities of two American football teams, A and B, reaching 6 points first. Given the assumptions that team A has a 0.62 chance of scoring on their possession and both teams have a scoring probability of 0.7, the user attempts to derive P(Af) and P(Bf). The calculations lead to a result of P(Af) = 0.557, which raises concerns as it contradicts the requirement that P(Af) should be greater than or equal to P(Apo). The user seeks clarification on potential mistakes in their assumptions or calculations, particularly regarding the relationship between P(Af) and P(Apo). The discussion highlights the complexities involved in probability calculations in sports scenarios.
themaestro
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Was hoping someone might be able to assist in this problem
Scenario is have a American football game with two team A and team B.

Am trying to work out the probability of each team getting to 6 points first, from the following infomation:

Let A be the event team A scores equal to or more than 6 points
Let B be the event team B scores equal to or more than 6 points
Assuming P(A) and P(B) are independant so P(A and B)=P(A)P(B)

Also making the assumption that Team A has possession and have a 0.62 chance of scoring a touchdown (worth 6 points) on this possession
Let this be labelled as P(Apo)

let Af be the event team A gets to 6 points first
let Bf be the event team B gets to 6 points first

Let P(A)=0.7, P(B)=0.7
P(Af given (A and B))=0.75
P(Bf given (A and B))=0.25

so question is what are P(Af) and P(Bf)?
when I try to calculate I get P(Af)=0.5775 which clearly can't be right as need
P(Af)>=P(Apo).
Is there any problems with the assumptions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
here is details of my attempt.


P(Af)=P(Af| (A and B)) *P(A and B) + P(Af| not(A and B))*P(not(A and B)) (1)

since P(Af| not(A and B)) can only occur if Team A reaches 6 points and B does not then this is equal to

(P(A)- P(A and B)) / (P(not(A and B))


sub into (1) and simplfying gives

P(Af)=P(Af| (A and B)) *P(A and B) +P(A)- P(A and B)


sub in values for these and I get P(Af)=0.557.


can't see where I have made a mistake here. If it is correct then it would imply I am not free to set P(Apo)>0.557 but I am not sure why this would be true. Surley as long as P(Apo)<P(A) i am free to set whatever value I want for this?
 
Just wondering if anyone has any ideas about where I have gone wrong? i reckon there must be some other relationship between P(Af) and P(Apo) that I have not taken account of.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top