Spring, Damper, Mass: What does a Mass Do?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chandran
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
AI Thread Summary
A spring provides a force proportional to the relative displacement of its ends, while a damper offers a force proportional to the relative velocity of its ends. The discussion centers on the role of mass, which is often misunderstood; it does not apply a force but rather resists changes in motion. Inertial forces, perceived in non-inertial reference frames, are artifacts of acceleration rather than actual forces exerted by the mass itself. When a force is applied to a mass, it accelerates, but the mass does not generate a force on its own. Understanding mass as a resistance to motion changes clarifies its role in dynamics.
chandran
Messages
137
Reaction score
1
My observations

1)a spring gives a force proportional to the relative displacement of its ends

2)a damper gives a force proportional to the relative velocity of its ends

What does a mass do

I read in a theory that a mass gives a force proportional to its acceleration
and this force is called inertial force.

But my understanding is that when a force is applied by some agent to a mass it will accelerate. How is that a mass itself applies a force?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chandran said:
What does a mass do
Think of mass as providing a resistance to changes in motion.

I read in a theory that a mass gives a force proportional to its acceleration
and this force is called inertial force.
Inertial forces only appear as an artifact of viewing things from a noninertial (accelerated) reference frame. (Which is often very useful.)

But my understanding is that when a force is applied by some agent to a mass it will accelerate. How is that a mass itself applies a force?
As long are you are viewing things from an inertial frame, the only forces are those provided by some agent. (Inertial forces have no agent.)
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top