Spring: does it have mass or is it massless?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of whether a spring has mass and how that affects the dynamics of a spring-mass system, particularly in relation to its period of motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of a spring being massless versus having mass, questioning how to calculate the mass of the spring and its effect on the system's period. There are discussions about the effective mass of the spring and its relation to the total mass in the system.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts, with some providing insights into the effective mass of the spring and its calculation. There is acknowledgment of the complexity involved in the analysis, and multiple interpretations regarding the term "effective mass" are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of assumptions regarding the deformation of the spring and how it may complicate the analysis. Participants also reflect on their understanding of the problem and the definitions being used.

TjGrinnell
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A spring has a spring constant of 10.0 N/m. I suspend a mass of 0.250 kg from the spring and set it in motion with an amplitude of 3.50 cm. I measure the period of the motion to be 1.15 s.
Is the spring massless? How do you know? If it is not massless, what is its effective mass?
If I suspend a mass of 0.500 kg from the spring and set it in motion with an amplitude of 2.75 cm, what will the period be?
Relevant Equations
F=-kx
T=2pi*sqrt(m/k)
I can easily do the second problem if only I knew the answer to the first. I am just not sure how I would go about figuring out if the spring has mass or not. And if it does, how would I calculate that mass?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the spring in the question were massless, what would the period of the motion be?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TjGrinnell
etotheipi said:
If the spring in the question were massless, what would the period of the motion be?
Ok... I was definitely trying to over complicate this. So to get the mass of the spring I would just have to solve for m and subtract the .250 kg mass, is this right? 1.15=2pi*sqrt(m/10)
 
It's the right idea, unfortunately life is a little bit more complicated. The effective mass of a spring-mass system if ##M## is the mass of the hanging object and ##m## is the mass of the spring is ##M + \frac{m}{3}##.

That is to say that the time period of a spring-mass system where the spring has mass ##m## is $$T = 2\pi \sqrt{\frac{M+\frac{m}{3}}{k}}$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TjGrinnell
etotheipi said:
It's the right idea, unfortunately life is a little bit more complicated. The effective mass of a spring-mass system if ##M## is the mass of the hanging object and ##m## is the mass of the spring is ##M + \frac{m}{3}##.

That is to say that the time period of a spring-mass system where the spring has mass ##m## is $$T = 2\pi \sqrt{\frac{M+\frac{m}{3}}{k}}$$
I see, I really appreciate the help.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
If you're interested, you can find a proof of it here.
 
The analysis in Wiki makes the tacit assumption that the deformation of the spring is homogeneous. Otherwise, the displacement distribution along the spring is much more complicated, and described by the wave equation.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
So when they ask for the "effective mass", do they want m or m/3 ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
Merlin3189 said:
So when they ask for the "effective mass", do they want m or m/3 ?

I believe the effective mass of the spring is termed ##\frac{m}{3}##, as opposed to the real mass of the spring ##m##. I suppose you're right in that we could've answered the question without knowing how this term related to the actual mass!

My mistake for not reading the question carefully enough 😁
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Merlin3189
  • #10
No criticism intended -1 :wink:
I didn't remember the m/3 and had just thought the rest of question might be answered with an additional mass added to the actual mass. I wondered if that's what they meant by effective mass.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K