Squared operators and sums of operators in practice

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dror
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators Sums
Dror
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Consider a one dimensional harmonic oscillator.

We have:
$$\hat{n} = \hat{a}^{\dagger} \hat{a} = \frac{m \omega}{2 \hbar} \hat{x}^2 + \frac{1}{2 \hbar m \omega} \hat{p}^2 - \frac{1}{2}$$
And:
$$\hat{H} = \hbar \omega (\hat{n} + \frac{1}{2})$$

Let's say we want to measure the total energy. We can, using the number operator, but, apparently, this requires (by the definition above) that we measure location and momentum twice consecutively in two separate identical systems.

This raises questions:

1. After measuring one observable, immediately measuring it again should not change the value measured nor the function. So, what is the meaning of this in practice?

2. The apparent requirement of interacting with two independent systems in order to calculate/measure the number of quanta in a system has to be wrong. ?

So finally: How does one measure total energy or number of quanta in reality?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dror said:
2. The apparent requirement of interacting with two independent systems in order to calculate/measure the number of quanta in a system has to be wrong. ?

The assumption is wrong. In "pure theory without conservation laws" we can just assume that all observables can be measured by a single apparatus.

In "pure theory with conservation laws" not all observables can be measured.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.4362

But for the actual process in real life of measuring, we don't always know how to measure every observable, and even if we did, it might be too expensive. However, for some systems, we do know how to measure all observables.
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0408011
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0512227v1
 
atyy, Thanks a lot for these enlightening references.
 
A self-adjoint operator, which defines a "measurable quantity", i.e. an "observable" tells you what you can measure in principle, but not how to measure it in practice; the obervable is silent about the construction of the apparatus and about the measurement process.
 
An operator like H which is the sum of x^2 and p^2 is a new operator. It does not mean that you have to measure both x and p at the same time. There will be other operators containing both x and p whose variance will become very large on the eigenstates of H.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top