Squared operators and sums of operators in practice

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dror
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators Sums
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the measurement of total energy and the number of quanta in a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator, focusing on the implications of using squared operators and sums of operators in quantum mechanics. Participants explore theoretical and practical aspects of measurement, including the challenges posed by conservation laws and the nature of observables.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the practical meaning of measuring an observable consecutively and its implications for the measurement process.
  • Another participant argues that the assumption of needing two independent systems to measure the number of quanta is incorrect, suggesting that in pure theory, all observables can be measured by a single apparatus.
  • Concerns are raised about the limitations of measuring observables in real-life scenarios, including the potential costs and the lack of knowledge about measurement techniques for certain observables.
  • A participant notes that self-adjoint operators define measurable quantities but do not provide guidance on the actual measurement process or apparatus construction.
  • It is proposed that operators like the Hamiltonian, which are sums of position and momentum operators, do not necessitate simultaneous measurement of both, and that other operators may exhibit large variances on the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of using multiple systems for measurement and the implications of conservation laws, indicating that multiple competing views remain without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the distinction between theoretical assumptions and practical measurement challenges, noting that certain observables may not be measurable due to limitations in knowledge or resources.

Dror
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Consider a one dimensional harmonic oscillator.

We have:
$$\hat{n} = \hat{a}^{\dagger} \hat{a} = \frac{m \omega}{2 \hbar} \hat{x}^2 + \frac{1}{2 \hbar m \omega} \hat{p}^2 - \frac{1}{2}$$
And:
$$\hat{H} = \hbar \omega (\hat{n} + \frac{1}{2})$$

Let's say we want to measure the total energy. We can, using the number operator, but, apparently, this requires (by the definition above) that we measure location and momentum twice consecutively in two separate identical systems.

This raises questions:

1. After measuring one observable, immediately measuring it again should not change the value measured nor the function. So, what is the meaning of this in practice?

2. The apparent requirement of interacting with two independent systems in order to calculate/measure the number of quanta in a system has to be wrong. ?

So finally: How does one measure total energy or number of quanta in reality?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dror said:
2. The apparent requirement of interacting with two independent systems in order to calculate/measure the number of quanta in a system has to be wrong. ?

The assumption is wrong. In "pure theory without conservation laws" we can just assume that all observables can be measured by a single apparatus.

In "pure theory with conservation laws" not all observables can be measured.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.4362

But for the actual process in real life of measuring, we don't always know how to measure every observable, and even if we did, it might be too expensive. However, for some systems, we do know how to measure all observables.
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0408011
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0512227v1
 
atyy, Thanks a lot for these enlightening references.
 
A self-adjoint operator, which defines a "measurable quantity", i.e. an "observable" tells you what you can measure in principle, but not how to measure it in practice; the obervable is silent about the construction of the apparatus and about the measurement process.
 
An operator like H which is the sum of x^2 and p^2 is a new operator. It does not mean that you have to measure both x and p at the same time. There will be other operators containing both x and p whose variance will become very large on the eigenstates of H.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K