B Stability of Droplet Climbing on a Needle with Varying Contact Angle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the behavior of a water droplet on a needle as its volume increases while maintaining a contact angle of 45°. As water is pushed out, the droplet's shape transitions from a spherical form to a configuration where the contact line may move up the needle, influenced by canthotaxis. The droplet's volume is limited by the fixed radius of the sphere defined by the contact angle, leading to a potential decrease in the volume of water outside the needle. Ultimately, a stable shape may not exist, resulting in a scenario where some water flows up the needle, creating a wet spot while a droplet remains at the needle's end with a contact angle greater than 135 degrees. This indicates a complex interaction between droplet volume, contact angle, and surface tension dynamics.
chingel
Messages
307
Reaction score
23
TL;DR Summary
Will a droplet forming at the end of the needle start climbing up the outer side of the needle to keep its contact angle? What shape will it form?
Let's say we are pushing water down a needle, the contact angle between the needle and the water is ##\mathrm{45°}##.
For simplicity let's assume there is no gravity.

As the water is initially moving down in the left image, the angle ##\theta=\mathrm{45°}## and the surface of the water is a part of a sphere with some fixed radius.

drop.png

When the water moves to the end of the needle, we have ##\varphi=\mathrm{315°}##. As we push more water out, ##\varphi## keeps decreasing and the surface should always be a part of a sphere (or flat when ##\varphi=\mathrm{270°}##).

I would think that the droplet volume grows until it reaches the contact angle with the outer side of the needle (i.e. ##\varphi=\mathrm{135°}## in the figure on the right), and then I think the liquid should start moving up the outer side of the needle, since the contact line will be pulled up to keep the contact angle?

Since there is only one specific radius for a sphere with the given contact angle all around the needle, it seems the surface can't stay a sphere, contain more water and keep the ##\mathrm{45°}## contact angle at the same time, so what will it do if we push more water out?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
[This question let's me use one of my favorite words...]

They way you structured the problem, the water will also wet the outer surface of the needle and so as the drop volume increases, the contact line will move and the droplet shape will be a sphere-ish shape (owing to gravitational deformation) until the mass of the drop can no longer be supported by the contact line tension, and a droplet will detach.

If, on the other hand, the contact line is pinned to the needle edge, canthotaxis (that's the word!) permits the contact angle to vary all the way to (IIRC) π-θ. The droplet shape is again sphere-ish.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara and berkeman
Let's assume for simplicity that there is no gravity.

I understand that canthotaxis says that in the figure in the OP on the right ##\varphi## can be between 135 and 315 degrees and the contact line is pinned to the edge of the needle in the whole range. My question is what happens after that, when you push out even more water.

If the contact line moves up and the surface remains a sphere, then the water droplet minus the needle will contain less water, because the sphere radius is fixed by the contact angle condition and now more needle is inside the sphere, so the water volume outside the needle decreases.

I think this means that there will be no one stable shape? That some unknown amount of water will flow up the needle and form a separate wet spot on the outside needle wall and a droplet will remain at the end of the needle with a ##\varphi## at some value over 135 degrees.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Hello! I am generating electrons from a 3D gaussian source. The electrons all have the same energy, but the direction is isotropic. The electron source is in between 2 plates that act as a capacitor, and one of them acts as a time of flight (tof) detector. I know the voltage on the plates very well, and I want to extract the center of the gaussian distribution (in one direction only), by measuring the tof of many electrons. So the uncertainty on the position is given by the tof uncertainty...
Back
Top