Stability of Orbits: Understand Gravitational & Kinetic Energy

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DuckAmuck
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbits Stability
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the stability of orbits, emphasizing the relationship between gravitational and kinetic energy as described by the energy equation E = K + U. Key formulas include kinetic energy K = (1/2)mv^2 and gravitational potential energy U = -GMm/r^2, where r is the radius, v is the velocity, M is the mass of the central object, and m is the mass of the orbiting object. The analysis reveals that when an orbiting object is slightly perturbed, the velocity changes according to the derived equation w = -sqrt(GM/r)s/(2r), indicating that the orbit can become slightly elliptical. The discussion concludes with a suggestion to examine effective potential for a better understanding of orbit stability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics and energy conservation principles
  • Familiarity with gravitational forces and Newton's laws
  • Knowledge of calculus for approximating small changes in variables
  • Basic understanding of orbital mechanics and elliptical orbits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of effective potential in orbital mechanics
  • Explore the derivation and implications of Kepler's laws of planetary motion
  • Learn about perturbation theory in celestial mechanics
  • Investigate the differences between circular and elliptical orbits
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, astrophysicists, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of orbital stability and energy interactions in celestial mechanics.

DuckAmuck
Messages
238
Reaction score
40
So I saw a video on youtube: http://youtu.be/uhS8K4gFu4s

And so I thought I'd try to understand the whole stable orbit thing.

So first you have a simple energy equation of E = K + U.

K = (1/2)mv^2 (kinetic energy)
U = -GMm/r^2 (gravitational energy)

r = radius of orbit
v = velocity of orbiting object
M = mass of center object
m = mass of orbiting object

And we want it to be a stable orbit in the first place, so we have:
v=sqrt(GM/r)

Now, let's say we slightly bump the object in orbit. So r -> r + s, where s is much less than r.
(also w is much less than v)

So we can adjust the stable orbit equation:

v=sqrt(GM/r)

v+w = sqrt(GM/(r+s))

approximate for small distances:

v+w = sqrt(GM/r)(1-s/(2r))

So then, you can subtract the original equation out and have:
w = -sqrt(GM/r)s/(2r)
This makes sense directionally, if you bump the orbiting object inwards, the velocity with increase.

So now, back to the energy equation: E = K + U
Since it's a stable orbit being bumped only slightly, you expect it to be able to eventually return to the same state, so E can't change.

So initially you have:

E = (1/2)mv^2 - GMm/r^2

Then apply the bump:

E' = ((1/2)mv^2 )(1+2w/v) - (GMm/r^2 )(1-s/r)

This then reduces to the form:

E' = E + mvw + (GMm/r^2 )s

Since E' must equal E, the two extra terms should add to zero:

E' = E + (mv)sqrt(GM/r)(-s/(2r)) + (GMm/r^2 )s

E' = E + (-1/2)(GMm/r^2 )s + (GMm/r^2 )s

So I am doing something wrong. I have a missing factor of two somewhere, but I don't know why.

If you guys can help, it will be appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Stable orbit need not be circular. So if you bump it a little, it can become slightly elliptic and v=sqrt(GM/r) no longer holds. I think that's where things go wrong with your derivation.

Best check of orbit stability is looking at effective potential.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
8K