Stability of spin top (tippy top)

  • Thread starter Thread starter GRQC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spin Stability
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the stability of the spin top, or tippy top, emphasizing that the stable configuration occurs when it spins on its stick. It highlights a recent study by Yutaka Shimomura and Keith Moffatt, which explains the physics behind this phenomenon, noting that an egg spinning on its side wobbles and precesses, leading to instability. As the egg spins, friction slows down precession while energy is converted into spin, causing it to transition into a more stable upright position. The study also clarifies that raw eggs cannot achieve this stability due to their internal movement. Overall, the mechanics of spinning objects reveal interesting dynamics that challenge initial intuitions about stability.
GRQC
Messages
159
Reaction score
0
Stability of "spin top" (tippy top)

I'm looking for a decent discussion of the stability of a spin top (sometimes called the tippy top), which shows that the stable configuration when spinning is the "inverted" one (spinning on the stick).

Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You picked the right season for that question, Easter. spin an egg.

Tip or Egg, the physics are not that different I guess.

The Science of Spin
Here’s a trick to try on a leftover Easter egg-or any hard-boiled egg. Spin it on its tip. Last week, Yutaka Shimomura of Japan’s Keio University and Keith Moffatt of Cambridge University said in Nature that they had figured out why. The details are mathematical, but the basic reason is that an egg spinning on its side always wobbles and starts precessing-moving its angle of lean in a circle like a tilted top. Its contact point with the surface slides around, creating friction that slows the precession while some energy turns into spin on the long axis. These two effects push the egg into a more stable state-spinning on end. It won’t work a with a raw egg, though-its innards slosh and dissipate energy.

Here is the abstract:

Nature 416, 385 - 386 (28 March 2002); doi:10.1038/416385a

Classical dynamics: Spinning eggs — a paradox resolved

H. K. MOFFATT* AND Y. SHIMOMURA†

* Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK
e-mail: hkm2@damtp.cam.ac.uk
† Department of Physics, Keio University, Hiyoshi, Yokohama 223-8521, Japan
e-mail: yutaka@phys-h.keio.ac.jp
If a hard-boiled egg is spun sufficiently rapidly on a table with its axis of symmetry horizontal, this axis will rise from the horizontal to the vertical. (A raw egg, by contrast, when similarly spun, will not rise.) Conversely, if an oblate spheroid is spun sufficiently rapidly with its axis of symmetry vertical, it will rise and spin about the vertical on its rounded edge with its axis of symmetry now rotating in a horizontal plane. In both cases, the centre of gravity rises; here we provide an explanation for this paradoxical behaviour, through derivation of a first-order differential equation for the inclination of the axis of symmetry.
 
I have a little dreidel, I made it out of clay
And when it's dry and ready, with dreidel I shall play.
Oh, Dreidel, Dreidel, Dreidel, I made you out of clay
Dreidel, Dreidel, Dreidel, with Dreidel I shall play.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top