How Do You Calculate Standard Enthalpy of Reaction Using Hess's Law?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zeshkani
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reaction Standard
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the standard enthalpy of reaction using Hess's Law, one can break down complex reactions into simpler steps, as demonstrated with the provided reactions. For reaction (3), the enthalpy change can be determined by reversing reaction (1) and applying reaction (2), leveraging the fact that enthalpy is a state function. The enthalpy changes for reactions (1) and (2) are given, allowing for the calculation of ΔrH and ΔrU for reaction (3). Additionally, the process can be applied to other thermodynamic changes, such as gas volume variations due to pressure and temperature changes. Understanding these principles simplifies the calculation of enthalpy in various chemical reactions.
zeshkani
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
this is my question , i just don't know how to get the standard enthaply of reaction
of this problem iam sure its easy, but i just don't get it, any help is welcome

14. Given the reactions (1) and (2) below, determine (a) ΔrH and ΔrU for reaction (3), (b) ΔrH for both HBr(g) and H2O(g) all at 298 K.
(1) H2(g) + Br2(l) → 2 HBr(g) ΔrH = - 72.80 kJ/mol
(2) 2 H2(g) + O2(g) → 2 H2O(g) ΔrH = –483.64 kJ/mol
(3) 4 HBr(g) + O2(g) → 2 Br2(l) + 2 H2O(g)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at reaction (3) as two separate phases, first reaction (1) happens in reverse and then reaction (2) happens. This isn't what happens but all the energies involved here are state functions which means that it doesn't matter how you got to that state, the energy is always the same. This way complex problems can be simplified.

PS. This also works for example when you want to calculate the difference in volume of a gas when you both heat it and change the pressure. First you calculate the change in volume due to the pressure change and than with the new volume you do the same with the new temperature (or vise versa, it doesn't matter). It's neat, give it a go ;)
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top